Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809454›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

How consistent are the key recommendations, and what is the quality of guidelines and expert consensus regarding paediatric cow's milk protein allergy?

Tengfei Li, Qingyong Zheng, Mingyue Zhang, Yiyi Li, Yongjia Zhou, Caihua Xu, Bowa Zhang, Zewei Wang, Jinhui Tian, Li Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tengfei Li *School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Qingyong Zheng *Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Mingyue ZhangEvidence-Based Medicine Centre, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yiyi LiSchool of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Yongjia ZhouSchool of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Caihua XuEvidence-Based Medicine Centre, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Bowa ZhangSchool of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Zewei WangFirst Clinical College of Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jinhui TianEvidence-Based Medicine Centre, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. tjh996@163.com.
Li ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gansu Province Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Province Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China. 106359625@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the quality and consistency of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and expert consensus on paediatric cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) to serve as a foundation for future revisions and enhancements of clinical guidelines and consensus documents. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across several databases, including the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, UpToDate, ClinicalKey, DynaMed Plus and BMJ Best Practice. We spanned the search period from the inception of each database through October 1, 2023. We integrated subject headings (MeSH/Emtree) and keywords into the search strategy, used the search methodologies of existing literature and developed it in collaboration with a librarian. Two trained researchers independently conducted the literature screening and data extraction. We evaluated methodological quality and recommendations by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) and AGREE-Recommendations for Excellence (AGREE-REX) tools. Moreover, we compared and summarized key recommendations from high-quality CPGs. Our study included 27 CPGs and expert consensus documents on CMPA. Only four CPGs (14.8%) achieved a high-quality AGREE II rating. The four high-quality CPGs consistently provided recommendations for CMPA. The highest scoring domains for AGREE II were 'scope and purpose' (77 ± 12%) and 'clarity of presentation' (75 ± 22%). The lowest scoring domains were 'stakeholder involvement' (49 ± 21%), 'rigor of development' (34 ± 20%) and 'applicability' (12 ± 20%). Evaluation with AGREE-REX generally demonstrated low scores across its domains.   Conclusion: Recommendations within high-quality CPGs for the paediatric CMPA showed fundamental consistency. Nevertheless, the methodology and recommendation content of CPGs and the expert consensus exhibited low quality, thus indicating a substantial scope for enhancement. Guideline developers should rigorously follow the AGREE II and AGREE-REX standards in creating CPGs or expert consensuses to guarantee their clinical efficacy in managing paediatric CMPA. What is Known: • The quality of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus on paediatric cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) remains uncertain. • There is a lack of clarity regarding the consistency of crucial recommendations for CMPA management. What is New: • Improving the methodological quality of guidelines and consensus on CMPA requires greater emphasis on stakeholder engagement, rigorous development processes, and practical applicability. • The recommendations from four high-quality guidelines align. However, addressing clinical applicability, integrating values and preferences, and ensuring actionable implementation are critical to improving the quality of all guidelines.

Indexed as

ConsensusMilk HypersensitivityPractice Guidelines as TopicChildConsensus Statements as TopicHumansMilk ProteinsMilk ProteinsAGREE IIAGREE-REXCow’s milk protein allergyExpert consensusGuidelinesQuality assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.