ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Signal separation of simultaneous dual-tracer PET imaging based on global spatial information and channel attention.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSimultaneous dual-tracer positron emission tomography (PET) imaging efficiently provides more complete information for disease diagnosis. The signal separation has long been a challenge of dual-tracer PET imaging. To predict the single-tracer images, we proposed a separation network based on global spatial information and channel attention, and connected it to FBP-Net to form the FBPnet-Sep model.
resultsExperiments using simulated dynamic PET data were conducted to: (1) compare the proposed FBPnet-Sep model to Sep-FBPnet model and currently existing Multi-task CNN, (2) verify the effectiveness of modules incorporated in FBPnet-Sep model, (3) investigate the generalization of FBPnet-Sep model to low-dose data, and (4) investigate the application of FBPnet-Sep model to multiple tracer combinations with decay corrections. Compared to the Sep-FBPnet model and Multi-task CNN, the FBPnet-Sep model reconstructed single-tracer images with higher structural similarity, peak signal-to-noise ratio and lower mean squared error, and reconstructed time-activity curves with lower bias and variation in most regions. Excluding the Inception or channel attention module resulted in degraded image qualities. The FBPnet-Sep model showed acceptable performance when applied to low-dose data. Additionally, it could deal with multiple tracer combinations. The qualities of predicted images, as well as the accuracy of derived time-activity curves and macro-parameters were slightly improved by incorporating a decay correction module.
conclusionsThe proposed FBPnet-Sep model was considered a potential method for the reconstruction and signal separation of simultaneous dual-tracer PET imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.