Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809313›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2024

Soil compaction reversed the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil hydraulic properties.

Püschel David, Rydlová Jana, Sudová Radka, Jansa Jan, Bitterlich Michael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Püschel DavidDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic. david.puschel@ibot.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-3242
Rydlová JanaDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0631-5762
Sudová RadkaDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-1839
Jansa JanLaboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 4, Vídeňská, 1083, 142 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-1774
Bitterlich MichaelAlbrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Division Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, Berlin, 14195, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-7327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) typically provide a wide range of nutritional benefits to their host plants, and their role in plant water uptake, although still controversial, is often cited as one of the hallmarks of this symbiosis. Less attention has been dedicated to other effects relating to water dynamics that the presence of AMF in soils may have. Evidence that AMF can affect soil hydraulic properties is only beginning to emerge. In one of our recent experiments with dwarf tomato plants, we serendipitously found that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Rhizophagus irregularis 'PH5') can slightly but significantly reduce water holding capacity (WHC) of the substrate (a sand-zeolite-soil mixture). This was further investigated in a subsequent experiment, but there we found exactly the opposite effect as mycorrhizal substrate retained more water than did the non-mycorrhizal substrate. Because the same substrate was used and other conditions were mostly comparable in the two experiments, we explain the contrasting results by different substrate compaction, most likely caused by different pot shapes. It seems that in compacted substrates, AMF may have no effect upon or even decrease the substrates' WHC. On the other hand, the AMF hyphae interweaving the pores of less compacted substrates may increase the capillary movement of water throughout such substrates and cause slightly more water to remain in the pores after the free water has drained. We believe that this phenomenon is worthy of mycorrhizologists' attention and merits further investigation as to the role of AMF in soil hydraulic properties.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeSoilSoil MicrobiologyWaterFungiGlomeromycotaSolanum lycopersicumSoilWaterArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiIrrigationPot shapeSand–zeolite–soil mixtureTomatoWater holding capacity

Identifiers

PMID38809313
PMCPMC11283390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.