Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809305›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2024

A framework and process for community-engaged, mixed-methods cancer needs assessments.

Todd Burus, Jessica R Thompson, Caree R McAfee, Lovoria B Williams, Jennifer Redmond Knight, Bin Huang, Sarojini Kanotra, Natalie P Wilhite, Elaine Russell, Melinda Rogers and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Todd BurusMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. tburus@uky.edu.
Jessica R ThompsonMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Caree R McAfeeMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Lovoria B WilliamsMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jennifer Redmond KnightKentucky Cancer Consortium, Lexington, KY, USA.
Bin HuangDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Sarojini KanotraKentucky Department for Public Health, Frankfort, KY, USA.
Natalie P WilhiteMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Elaine RussellMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Melinda RogersKentucky Cancer Program, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Connie L SorrellKentucky Cancer Program, Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Christine StroebelMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Rachael KingAmerican Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA.
Pamela C HullMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
KENTUCKY BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE (KYBRFS)U58DP006058 · DP · KY ST CABINET/HEALTH/FAMILY SERVICES · PI KANOTRA, SAROJINI · 2015 to 2015
$109k
CDC HHS NU58DP006058-05-00CDC HHS NU58DP006313-04-02NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP006058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NIH HHS P30CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCommunity health needs assessments are required for most state and local public health agencies and non-profit hospitals. Typically based on community health improvement planning models, these assessments encompass overall community health and multiple diseases to inform program planning. National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Cancer Centers and community-based cancer-focused programs share the goal of reducing cancer burden in the catchment areas they serve. However, to date, no published models exist to guide cancer-specific needs assessments for a determined geographic area that can inform both public health and research initiatives. The purpose of this article is to outline a cancer needs assessment (CNA) framework and community-engaged, mixed-methods process, along with a case study of how we applied it in Kentucky.

methodsWe convened a steering committee of key organizational partners to provide input throughout the process. We developed a conceptual framework of multi-level determinants affecting cancer-related outcomes. We incorporated both quantitative and qualitative data gathered through a variety of means, including a novel application of group concept mapping to guide definition of priorities.

resultsThe resulting CNA has helped guide strategic planning and priorities for Kentucky's Cancer Action Plan, Markey Cancer Center, state agencies, and community-based organizations.

conclusionThis framework and process can be used collaboratively by cancer center Community Outreach and Engagement offices, public health agencies, oncology programs, and community partners to plan impactful cancer control programs and research in their catchment areas. Universities can also use them to inform the planning of community engagement and health equity research efforts.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentNeoplasmsHumansKentuckyPublic HealthUnited StatesCatchment areaCommunity outreachNeeds assessmentQualitative researchQuantitative evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38809305
PMCPMC11461567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.