Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809266›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Assessing the usefulness of tubomanometry as a diagnostic tool in Eustachian tube dysfunction.

Mayte Herrera, Estefanía Miranda, Ithzel Villarreal, Teresa Crespo, Guillermo Plaza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tubomanometry-Score as Predictor of Outcome for Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty in Patients With Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mayte HerreraDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Carretera del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain.
Estefanía MirandaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Carretera del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain.
Ithzel VillarrealDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Carretera del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain.
Teresa CrespoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo PlazaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Carretera del Molino 2, Fuenlabrada, 28942, Madrid, Spain. guillermo.plaza@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-4921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of tubomanometry (TMM) in diagnosing obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) before balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET).

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted, involving 25 patients with sinonasal pathology, 75 patients with middle ear disease, and 25 healthy subjects, totaling 250 ears. All participants underwent comprehensive physical examinations, including TMM, nasal videoendoscopy, otoendoscopy, Valsalva maneuver (VM), tympanometry, and audiometry. Additionally, various scales such as ETDQ-7 and ETS-7 were employed. Tympanometry served as the gold standard for assessing OETD, and comparisons were made among the measures across the three groups.

resultsAmong the 125 participants, 44.8% (n = 56) were female, and 55.2% (n = 69) were male, with ages ranging from 19 to 93 years (M = 48.5; SD = 15.6). In our study, VM demonstrated high sensitivity (86.3%) when tympanometry was considered the gold standard. Conversely, TMM, ETDQ-7, and ETS-7 exhibited high specificity, with ETDQ-7 showing the highest specificity (87.4%). Regarding TMM, all R values in patients within the middle ear disease group were pathological (R > 1).

conclusionTMM has exhibited notable specificity as a diagnostic tool compared to tympanogram and VM. Nonetheless, the combination of TMM and ETDQ-7 has enabled us to conduct a diagnostic assessment with high sensitivity and specificity for chronic OETD diagnosis.

Indexed as

Acoustic Impedance TestsEar DiseasesEustachian TubeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultETDQ-7Eustachian tube dysfunctionTubomanometryTympanogramValsalva maneuver

Identifiers

PMID38809266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.