Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809146›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2024

Exact Integral Formulas for False Discovery Rate and the Variance of False Discovery Proportion.

Rovshan G Sadygov, Justin X Zhu, Henock M Deberneh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rovshan G SadygovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1590-155X
Justin X ZhuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.
Henock M DebernehDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.

Funding

Novel computational methods for in vivo proteome dynamics estimation using heavy water metabolic labeling and LC-MSR01GM112044 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI SADYGOV, ROVSHAN G · 2015 to 2023
$2.7M
Protein turnover estimation from fragment ions and precursor enrichment in heavy water labeled LC-MS experimentsR01GM149762 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI Rovshan G Sadygov · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112044NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM149762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple hypothesis testing is an integral component of data analysis for large-scale technologies such as proteomics, transcriptomics, or metabolomics, for which the false discovery rate (FDR) and positive FDR (pFDR) have been accepted as error estimation and control measures. The pFDR is the expectation of false discovery proportion (FDP), which refers to the ratio of the number of null hypotheses to that of all rejected hypotheses. In practice, the expectation of ratio is approximated by the ratio of expectation; however, the conditions for transforming the former into the latter have not been investigated. This work derives exact integral expressions for the expectation (pFDR) and variance of FDP. The widely used approximation (ratio of expectations) is shown to be a particular case (in the limit of a large sample size) of the integral formula for pFDR. A recurrence formula is provided to compute the pFDR for a predefined number of null hypotheses. The variance of FDP was approximated for a practical application in peptide identification using forward and reversed protein sequences. The simulations demonstrate that the integral expression exhibits better accuracy than the approximate formula in the case of a small number of hypotheses. For large sample sizes, the pFDRs obtained by the integral expression and approximation do not differ substantially. Applications to proteomics data sets are included.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationFalse Positive ReactionsHumansPeptidesPeptidesfalse discovery rateintegral expression for false discovery rateintegral formula for variance of false discovery proportionmultiple hypothesis testingpositive false discovery ratevariance of false discovery proportion

Identifiers

PMID38809146
PMCPMC12306663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.