Different sampling strategies for optimal detection of the overall genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Pathoadaptive evolution and clonal dissemination of community- associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Egypt.BMC infectious diseases · 2026
   Article
2. Genomic epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance prevalence ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
   Article
3. Microbial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bloodstream Infections in Hospitalized Patients During 2019-2023 in Xiangyang, China.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as