Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808844›Full record

ArticleRevista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica2024

Cost of controlling the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in the Peruvian amazon.

Salomon Durand, Arles Paredes, Carlos Pacheco, Ray Fernandez, Jose Herrera, César Cabezas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Highway paving increased dengue transmission in the Peruvian Amazon.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salomon DurandInstituto Peruano de Investigaciones en Salud, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-8879
Arles ParedesDirección Regional de salud Loreto, Iquitos, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0462-9736
Carlos PachecoDirección Regional de salud Loreto, Iquitos, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7192-2904
Ray FernandezDirección Regional de salud Loreto, Iquitos, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5549-553X
Jose HerreraInstituto Peruano de Investigaciones en Salud, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8245-8626
César CabezasInstituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5120-0713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE.: Motivation for the study. Dengue prevention and control is based on the control of its vector. This study was conducted because of the need to know the costs associated with Aedes aegypti control in a region that carries out planned vector control activities. Main findings. The costs incurred in dengue vector control in the Loreto region in 2017 and 2018 amounted to PEN 4,066,380.25 and PEN 3,807,858.73, respectively. Implications. Knowing the cost of vector control activities will allow us to better plan these activities and have a basis for cost-effectiveness studies with other methods of prevention and control of dengue. To estimate the costs incurred in the control of Aedes aegypti in the Loreto region, during the years 2017 and 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: We conducted a partial retrospective economic evaluation of the costs of Aedes aegypti control of the Regional Health Directorate Loreto, during the implementation of the Regional Plan for Surveillance and Control of Aedes aegypti. Documentation such as plans, intervention reports and payment slips were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with professional personnel involved in vector control, on the costs of control interventions. RESULTS.: We found that the costs incurred in dengue vector control in the Loreto Region in the two years were: PEN 3,807,858 and PEN 4,066,380 during 2017 and 2018, respectively (USD 1,175,264 and USD 1,1210,232 at the 2017 and 2018 exchange rate). However, the effect of control activities is short-lived. CONCLUSIONS.: The high cost involved in vector control with the methods currently used and the short duration of its effect make it unsustainable. Studies should be conducted in order to find other more efficient methods for dengue control.

Indexed as

AedesDengueMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAnimalsCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansPeruRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38808844
PMCPMC11149769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.