Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808817›Full record

ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2024

Use of F18 bioglass putty for induced membrane technique in segmental bone defect of the radius in rabbits.

José Ivaldo Siqueira Silva Júnior, Sheila Canevese Rahal, Jennifer Gabriela Figueroa Coris, Bruna Martins da Silva, Felipe Cesar da Silva Brasileiro, Diana Nascimento, Zara Alves Lacerda, Jeana Pereira da Silva, Maria Jaqueline Mamprim, Marina Trevelin Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

José Ivaldo Siqueira Silva JúniorUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-0647
Sheila Canevese RahalUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-4093
Jennifer Gabriela Figueroa CorisUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1757-5682
Bruna Martins da SilvaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9944-8643
Felipe Cesar da Silva BrasileiroUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Veterinary Clinics - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-991X
Diana NascimentoUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Veterinary Clinics - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-8720
Zara Alves LacerdaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Department of Veterinary Clinics - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-9690
Jeana Pereira da SilvaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-6288
Maria Jaqueline MamprimUniversidade Estadual Paulista - School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction - Botucatu (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-5584
Marina Trevelin SouzaVetra - Produtos Cerâmicos de Alta Tecnologia - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-6034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the inductive capacity of F18 bioglass putty on the induced membrane technique in a segmental bone defect of the rabbit's radius.

methodsTen female Norfolk at 24 months of age were used. The animals were randomly separated based on postoperative time points: five rabbits at 21 and four at 42 days. A 1-cm segmental bone defect was created in both radii. The bone defects were filled with an F18 bioglass putty.

resultsImmediate postoperative radiographic examination revealed the biomaterial occupying the segmental bone defect as a well-defined radiopaque structure with a density close to bone tissue. At 21 and 42 days after surgery, a reduction in radiopacity and volume of the biomaterial was observed, with particle dispersion in the bone defect region. Histologically, the induced membrane was verified in all animals, predominantly composed of fibrocollagenous tissue. In addition, chondroid and osteoid matrices undergoing regeneration, a densely vascularized tissue, and a foreign body type reaction composed of macrophages and multinucleated giant cells were seen.

conclusionsthe F18 bioglass putty caused a foreign body-type inflammatory response with the development of an induced membrane without expansion capacity to perform the second stage of the Masquelet technique.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCeramicsRadiusAnimalsFemaleMembranes, ArtificialRabbitsRandom AllocationReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsBiocompatible MaterialsBioglassBone SubstitutesMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID38808817
PMCPMC11126304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.