Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808313›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2024

Real-World Evidence to Reinforce Clinical Trial Evidence in Health Technology Assessment: A Critical Review of Real-World Evidence Requirements from Seven Countries and Recommendations to Improve Acceptance.

Katia Thokagevistk, Céline Coppo, Laetitia Rey, Amanda Carelli, Veronica Díez, Sarah Vaselenak, Liana Oliveira, Ajay Patel, Emilia Sicari, Teresa Ramos and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Katia ThokagevistkRoche, 4 Cr de l'Île Seguin, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Céline CoppoIQVIA, 17 bis Tsse. des Reflets, 92400 Courbevoie, France.
Laetitia ReyIQVIA, 17 bis Tsse. des Reflets, 92400 Courbevoie, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3073-0875
Amanda CarelliRoche, Rua Dr. Rubens Gomes Bueno, 691-Várzea de Baixo, São Paulo 04730-903, Brazil.
Veronica DíezF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., C/Ribera del Loira 50, 28042 Madrid, Spain.
Sarah VaselenakRoche, 7070 Mississauga Rd, Mississauga, ON L5N 5M8, Canada.
Liana OliveiraRoche, Rua Dr. Rubens Gomes Bueno, 691-Várzea de Baixo, São Paulo 04730-903, Brazil.
Ajay PatelRoche Products Ltd., Hexagon Place, Shire Park, Falcon Way, Welwyn Garden City AL7 1TW, UK.
Emilia SicariRoche SpA, Viale Gian Battista Stucchi, 110, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Teresa RamosF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., C/Ribera del Loira 50, 28042 Madrid, Spain.
Susanne SchachRoche, Emil-Barell-Straße 1, 79639 Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Erika SchirghuberF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.
Alex SimpsonF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-2604
Remy ChoquetRoche, 4 Cr de l'Île Seguin, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1843-489X
Katell Le LayRoche, 4 Cr de l'Île Seguin, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0643-6849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world evidence (RWE) can reinforce clinical trial evidence in health technology assessment (HTA).

objectivesReview HTA bodies' (HTAbs) requirements for RWE, real uses, and acceptance across seven countries (Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and outline recommendations that may improve acceptance of RWE in efficacy/effectiveness assessments and appraisals processes.

methodsRWE requirements were summarized based on HTAbs' guidelines. Acceptance by HTAbs was evaluated based on industry experience and case studies.

resultsAs of June 2022, RWE methodological guidelines were in place in three of the seven countries. HTAbs typically requested analyses based on local data sources, but the preferred study design and data sources differed. HTAbs had individual submission, assessment, and appraisal processes; some allowed early meetings for the protocol and/or results validation, though few involved external experts or medical societies to provide input to assessment and appraisal. The extent of submission, assessment, and appraisal requirements did not necessarily reflect the degree of acceptance.

conclusionAll the countries reviewed face common challenges regarding the use of RWE. Our proposals address the need to facilitate collaboration and communication with industry and regulatory agencies and the need for specific guidelines describing RWE design and criteria of acceptance throughout the assessment and appraisal processes.

Indexed as

appraisalguidelineshealth policieshealth technology assessmentreal-world datareal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID38808313
PMCPMC11130860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.