Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808312›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2024

Conceptualisation and Role of Market Access in Pharmaceutical Industry: A Scoping Review.

Clara Fatoye, Gillian Yeowell, Eula Miller, Isaac Odeyemi, Chidozie Mbada

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clara FatoyeDepartment of Health and Social Care, University Campus Oldham, Oldham OL1 1BB, UK; clara.fatoye@oldham.ac.uk.
Gillian YeowellDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK; g.yeowell@mmu.ac.uk (G.Y.); iodeyemi@aol.com (I.O.).
Eula MillerSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK; e.miller@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-2634
Isaac OdeyemiDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK; g.yeowell@mmu.ac.uk (G.Y.); iodeyemi@aol.com (I.O.).
Chidozie MbadaDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK; g.yeowell@mmu.ac.uk (G.Y.); iodeyemi@aol.com (I.O.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3666-7432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the concept and dynamic process of the evolution of professional identity and roles of market access (MA) in the pharmaceutical industry (pharma) is critical to personal, interpersonal, and professional levels of development and impact.

objectiveThe aim was to carry out a scoping review of the conceptualisation of MA within pharma. DATA SOURCES: BioMed Central, WorldCat.org, and Directory of Open Access Journals were searched from 2003 to 2023. STUDY SELECTION: All articles on concepts or definitions and other surrogate terms on MA in pharma were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Keywords generated from an initial cursory literature search on MA in pharma were used in conjunction with AND/OR as search terms. Using the data charting method, key findings were mapped and summarised descriptively. inductive analysis was performed, allowing codes/themes that are relevant to the concept to emerge. DATA SYNTHESIS: Arskey and O'Malley's six-stage framework and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews extension checklist were used as the review and reporting templates. The databases search yielded 222 results. Following title and abstract screening, a total of 146 papers were screened, and 127 of them were excluded. Full-text review was conducted for 19 papers that were deemed by two reviewers to meet the eligibility criteria. One of the authors arbitrated on disputed papers for inclusion. Only 14 of the included papers were found to meet the criteria for the final analysis. Five conceptual dimensions of MA in pharma were identified as "right products", "right patient", "right price", "right point" (time), and "right place" (setting).

conclusionsMarket access in pharma is a process that commences with the development and availability of the right products that are proven to be efficacious and disease/condition-specific (including medications, medical devices, and vaccines); specifically produced for the right patients or end users who will maximise best clinical outcomes and economic value; delivered at the right point in a timely, sustained, and efficient manner, given at the right price (commercially viable or reimbursed price that represents good value); and conducted within the economic, policy, societal, and technological contexts, with the overarching goal of achieving the best patient outcomes and ensuring product profitability.

Indexed as

market accesspharmaceutical industryprofessionalscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38808312
PMCPMC11130876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.