Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808295›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024

Detection of the

Kholik Kholik, Akhmad Sukri, Katty Hendriana Priscilia Riwu, Shendy Canadya Kurniawan, Aswin Rafif Khairullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Molecular detection of theVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kholik KholikDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia.
Akhmad SukriDepartement of Biology Education, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia.
Katty Hendriana Priscilia RiwuDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia.
Shendy Canadya KurniawanMaster Program of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, Specialisation in Molecule, Cell and Organ Functioning, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Aswin Rafif KhairullahResearch Center for Veterinary Science, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bacterial identification can be done using various testing techniques. Molecular techniques are often used to research dangerous diseases, an approach using genetic information on the pathogenic agent. The enterohemorrhagic invasive species Aim: This study aims to detect and identify the invasive species Methods: Fresh fecal samples from horses on Sumbawa Island were isolated and identified, then continued with molecular examination using the gene encoding Results: qPCR testing in this study showed that six sample isolates that were positive for Conclusion: Validation, standardization of the development, and modification of qPCR technology must be carried out to harmonize testing throughout to avoid wrong interpretation of the test results so that the determination of actions to eradicate and control diseases originating from animals in the field does not occur.

Indexed as

Bacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsEscherichia coli O157Escherichia coli ProteinsHorse DiseasesHorsesIndonesiaReceptors, Cell SurfaceBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsChuA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfacechuAEscherichia coli 0157:H7HorseInvasiveqPCR

Identifiers

PMID38808295
PMCPMC11128647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.