Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808268›Full record

ArticleACS applied engineering materials2024

Ink-Based Additive Manufacturing of a Polymer/Coal Composite: A Non-Traditional Reinforcement.

Barath Sundaravadivelan, Dharneedar Ravichandran, Anna Dmochowska, Dhanush Patil, Sri Vaishnavi Thummalapalli, Arunachalam Ramanathan, Jorge Peixinho, Guillaume Miquelard-Garnier, Kenan Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied engineering materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barath SundaravadivelanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-267X
Dharneedar RavichandranSchool of Manufacturing Systems and Networks Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona 85212, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-7934
Anna DmochowskaLaboratoire PIMM, CNRS, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Cnam, HESAM Universite, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0232-0780
Dhanush PatilSchool of Manufacturing Systems and Networks Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona 85212, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0093-3997
Sri Vaishnavi ThummalapalliSchool of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural, and Mechanical Engineering (ECAM), College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5903-6131
Arunachalam RamanathanSchool of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural, and Mechanical Engineering (ECAM), College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-5663
Jorge PeixinhoLaboratoire PIMM, CNRS, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Cnam, HESAM Universite, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-3406
Guillaume Miquelard-GarnierLaboratoire PIMM, CNRS, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Cnam, HESAM Universite, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-8941
Kenan SongSchool of Manufacturing Systems and Networks Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona 85212, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-2449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coal, a crucial natural resource traditionally employed for generating carbon-rich materials and powering global industries, has faced escalating scrutiny due to its adverse environmental impacts outweighing its utility in the contemporary world. In response to the worldwide shift toward sustainability, the United States alone has witnessed an approximate 50% reduction in coal consumption. Nevertheless, the ample availability of coal has spurred interest in identifying alternative sustainable applications. This research delves into the feasibility of utilizing coal as a nonconventional carbon-rich reinforcement in direct ink writing (DIW)-based 3D printing techniques. Our investigation here involves a thermosetting resin serving as a matrix, incorporating pulverized coal (250 μm in size) and carbon black as the reinforcement and a viscosity modifier, respectively. The ink formulation is meticulously designed to exhibit shear-thinning behavior essential for DIW 3D printing, ensuring uniform and continuous printing. Mechanical properties are assessed through the 3D printing of ASTM standard specimens to validate the reinforcing impact. Remarkably, the study reveals that a 2 wt % coal concentration in the ink leads to a substantial improvement in both tensile and flexural properties, resulting in enhancements of 35 and 12.5%, respectively. Additionally, the research demonstrates the printability of various geometries with coal as reinforcement, opening up new possibilities for coal utilization while pursuing more sustainable manufacturing and applications.

Identifiers

PMID38808268
PMCPMC11129187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.