ArticleACS applied engineering materials2024
Ink-Based Additive Manufacturing of a Polymer/Coal Composite: A Non-Traditional Reinforcement.
Article in ACS applied engineering materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coal, a crucial natural resource traditionally employed for generating carbon-rich materials and powering global industries, has faced escalating scrutiny due to its adverse environmental impacts outweighing its utility in the contemporary world. In response to the worldwide shift toward sustainability, the United States alone has witnessed an approximate 50% reduction in coal consumption. Nevertheless, the ample availability of coal has spurred interest in identifying alternative sustainable applications. This research delves into the feasibility of utilizing coal as a nonconventional carbon-rich reinforcement in direct ink writing (DIW)-based 3D printing techniques. Our investigation here involves a thermosetting resin serving as a matrix, incorporating pulverized coal (250 μm in size) and carbon black as the reinforcement and a viscosity modifier, respectively. The ink formulation is meticulously designed to exhibit shear-thinning behavior essential for DIW 3D printing, ensuring uniform and continuous printing. Mechanical properties are assessed through the 3D printing of ASTM standard specimens to validate the reinforcing impact. Remarkably, the study reveals that a 2 wt % coal concentration in the ink leads to a substantial improvement in both tensile and flexural properties, resulting in enhancements of 35 and 12.5%, respectively. Additionally, the research demonstrates the printability of various geometries with coal as reinforcement, opening up new possibilities for coal utilization while pursuing more sustainable manufacturing and applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.