ArticleMethodsX2024
Accurate digitization of EEG electrode locations by electromagnetic tracking system: The proposed head rotation method and comparison against optical system.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) electrode digitization is crucial for accurate EEG source estimation, and several commercial systems are available for this purpose. The present study aimed to evaluate the digitizing accuracy of electromagnetic and optical systems. Additionally, we introduced a novel rotation method for the electromagnetic system and compared its accuracy with the conventional method of electromagnetic and optical systems. In the conventional method, the operator moves around a stationary participant to digitize, while the participant does not move their head or body. In contrast, in our proposed rotation method with an electromagnetic system, the operator rotates the participant sitting on a swivel chair to digitize in a consistent position. We showed high localization accuracy in both the optical and electromagnetic systems, with an average localization error of less than 3.6 mm. Comparisons of the digitization methods revealed that the electromagnetic system demonstrates superior digitizing accuracy compared to the optical system. Notably, the proposed rotational method is the most accurate among the three methods, which can be attributed to the consistent positioning of EEG electrode digitization within the electromagnetic field. Considering the affordability of the electromagnetic system, our findings provide valuable insights for researchers aiming for precise EEG source estimation.•The study compares the accuracy of electromagnetic and optical systems for EEG electrode digitization, introducing a novel rotation method for improved consistency and precision.•The electromagnetic system, especially with the proposed rotation method, achieves superior digitizing accuracy over the optical system.•Highlighting the cost-effectiveness and precision of the electromagnetic system with the rotation method, this research offers significant insights for achieving precise EEG source estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.