Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38808075›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2024

Effect of Polywave and Monowave Light Curing Units on the Microtensile Bond Strength and Failure Types of Different Bulk-Fill Resin Composites: An in vitro Study.

Leonor Castro-Ramirez, María Espinoza-Salcedo, José Huamani-Echaccaya, Marysela Ladera-Castañeda, Luis Cervantes-Ganoza, Emily Hernández-Huamaní, Rosa Aroste-Andía, Percy Gavilán-Chávez, César Cayo-Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonor Castro-RamirezPostgraduate School, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Trujillo, Peru.
María Espinoza-SalcedoPostgraduate School, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Trujillo, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-9408-4396
José Huamani-EchaccayaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica, Peru.
Marysela Ladera-CastañedaFaculty of Dentistry and Postgraduate School, Research Team "Salud Pública - Salud Integral", Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima, Peru.
Luis Cervantes-GanozaFaculty of Stomatology, Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Lima, Peru.
Emily Hernández-HuamaníSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica, Peru.
Rosa Aroste-AndíaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica, Peru.
Percy Gavilán-ChávezSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica, Peru.
César Cayo-RojasSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-7841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of polywave and monowave light-emitting diode curing units on the microtensile bond strength and failure types of three bulk-fill resin composites. Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental study was performed on 180 microbars obtained from human third molars and were distributed into 12 groups according to the type of bulk-fill resin composite and the light-curing unit. Third molars were restored using Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, Tetric Results: There were significant differences in the microtensile bond strength between the Filtek One Bulk Fill restorative and Opus Bulk-Fill (p = 0.042) when light was cured with the polywave unit at standard power. On the other hand, the Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative and Opus Bulk Fill resins showed significant differences in microtensile bond strength when light was cured with the monowave unit compared with the polywave unit (p<0.05). Conclusion: The presence of alternative photoinitiator systems that are more reactive than camphorquinone produced higher microtensile bond strength in Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill and Opus Bulk Fill resins when light-cured with a high and standard polywave unit, respectively, compared to Filtek One Bulk Fill resins. Finally, Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill and Opus Bulk Fill resins had the highest percentage of mixed failures, while Filtek One Bulk Fill resin had adhesive failures, which was related to its lower microtensile bond strength.

Indexed as

bond strengthbulk filldental materialslight curing unitsmonowavepolywaveresin composite

Identifiers

PMID38808075
PMCPMC11131952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.