ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024
Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Experiences During, Awareness of, and Attitudes Toward Research for People With Parkinson Disease.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex difference in Parkinson's disease hospitalization rates in Brazil (2010-2024).BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Sex and gender-related differences in neurological diseases: current challenges and recommendations for clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Sex and gender differences in Lewy body dementia: a narrative review.Equity neuroscience · 2025Article
- Patient care practices for LGBTQ+ individuals in clinical genetics: A scoping review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Erratum: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Experiences During, Awareness of, and Attitudes Toward Research for People with Parkinson Disease.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Sex Differences for Social Determinants Associated with Lewy Body Dementia Onset and Diagnosis.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Presentation, progression, and treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) can differ based on sex and gender. However, knowledge on PD is limited by the characteristics of research participants, and most of the participants are men. In this study, we aimed to identify the attitudes toward and barriers to research participation for people with PD (PwP) based on their sexual orientation and gender identity. Methods: Data were obtained from the Fox Insight on March 16, 2023, for PwP who completed the Results: More than 68% of the participants were willing to participate in research; only 43.7% heard about research opportunities, and 52.3% knew where to find a study. Approximately 86.8% of the participants reported hearing about a study from their doctor would make them more likely to participate. A higher percentage of SGM were concerned about transportation and researchers not understanding or respecting their beliefs; a higher percentage of cisgender heterosexual women were concerned about transportation, data privacy, and their family's reaction to genetic results; and a higher percentage of cisgender heterosexual men were concerned about time required for research activities and complex forms. Age and socioeconomic variables were significantly associated with approach toward research that differed between the groups. Discussion: PwP are willing to participate in research, and health care providers can facilitate their participation. Barriers to research participation related to sexual and gender identity exist and must be addressed to increase our understanding of PD in underrepresented populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.