SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024
miR-29 as diagnostic biomarkers for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus associated microRNAs in tuberculosis susceptibility: a systematic review and bioinformatic analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of interspecies colostrum and milk replacement on circulating sncRNA dynamics of neonatal goat kids.RNA biology · 2026Article
- Different MicroRNAs expression inRNA biology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of urinary extracellular vesicles and microRNAs to diagnose urogenital tuberculosis.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Recent progress in tuberculosis diagnosis: insights into blood-based biomarkers and emerging technologies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The timely diagnosis of tuberculosis through innovative biomarkers that do not rely on sputum samples is a primary focus for strategies aimed at eradicating tuberculosis. miR-29 is an important regulator of tuberculosis pathogenesis. Its differential expression pattern in healthy, latent, and active people who develop tuberculosis has revealed its potential as a biomarker in recent studies. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for the role of miR-29 in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Methods: EMBASE, PubMed, CNKI, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing predefined keywords for literature published from 2000 to February 2024.Included in the analysis were studies reporting on the accuracy of miR-29 in the diagnosis of tuberculosis, while articles assessing other small RNAs were not considered. All types of study designs, including case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies, were included, whether prospectively or retrospectively sampled, and the quality of included studies was determined utilizing the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was analyzed via the construction of funnel plots. Heterogeneity among studies and summary results for specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) are depicted in forest plots. Results: A total of 227 studies were acquired from the various databases, and 18 articles were selected for quantitative analysis. These articles encompassed a total of 2,825 subjects, primarily sourced from the Asian region. Patient specimens, including sputum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, cerebrospinal fluid and serum/plasma samples, were collected upon admission and during hospitalization for tuberculosis testing. miR-29a had an overall sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 77, 85%) and an overall specificity of 82% (95% CI 78, 86%) for detecting tuberculosis. DOR was 21 (95% CI 16-28), and the area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86, 0.91). miR-29a had slightly different diagnostic efficacy in different specimens. miR-29a showed good performance in both the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. miR-29b and miR-29c also had a good performance in diagnosis of tuberculosis. Conclusion: As can be seen from the diagnostic performance of miR-29, miR-29 can be used as a potential biomarker for the rapid detection of tuberculosis. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=461107.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.