ArticleCureus2024
Valuable Predictors for Non-measurability of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (FFRCT) is a variable tool for coronary disease diagnosis that non-invasively provides the value of FFR. It can add physiological information to coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and reduce unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (CAG). However, it cannot be analyzed in some cases, which is also called "non-measurability." While FFRCT has become globally widespread, the current data on non-measurability are lacking. This study aimed to determine the rate of non-measurability and identify predictors thereof in routine clinical settings to explore potential approaches to reduce the non-measurability rate. Methods and results This retrospective observational single-center study included consecutive patients who underwent FFRCTanalysis in Japan. The mean age of the overall population was 71.3 ± 10.6, and an FFRCTof ≤0.8 was seen in 47.6% of patients with a measurable FFRCT. Of the 307 enrolled patients, FFRCT analysis was not feasible in 21 cases (6.8%). Heart rate (HR) at a CT scan and coronary calcium scores (CCS) were significantly higher in patients with non-measurability than those in patients whose FFRCT was appropriately analyzed (HR: 69.6±8.9 bpm vs. 61.0±11.1 bpm; p < 0.01; CCS; 931.2 (290.8, 1451.3) vs. 322.9 (100.7, 850.0); p < 0.01). Multiple logistic regression showed that HR was an independent predictor for non-measurability (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidential interval: 1.02, 1.09; p < 0.01)). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of HR and CCS was 63 bpm (specificity: 67.1%; sensitivity: 76.2%) and 729.2 (specificity: 71.3%; sensitivity: 66.7%). In addition, the combination of two features (HR > 63 bpm and CCS > 729.2) showed a high negative predictive value (99.3%) for FFRCT non-measurability. Conclusions In this study, the rate of FFRCTnon-measurability was 6.8%. Higher HR at a CT scan and CCS were significantly associated with non-measurability, and in cases with both HR and CCS below a specified threshold, the likelihood of ruling out non-measurability could be significantly high. Our findings suggest that reducing the HR to ideally under 63 bpm at the time of the CT scan significantly ensures feasibility. Further study on large-scale cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.