Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38807764›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

The impact of pre-, pro- and synbiotics supplementation in colorectal cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Mariana Melo Moreira, Marta Carriço, Manuel Luís Capelas, Nuno Pimenta, Teresa Santos, Susana Ganhão-Arranhado, Antti Mäkitie, Paula Ravasco

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Gut microbiota interplay with autophagy-EMT dynamics in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. SynergisticMicrobiome research reports · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariana Melo MoreiraUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing (FCSE), Lisboa, Portugal.
Marta CarriçoChampalimaud Foundation, Nutrition Service of Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuel Luís CapelasUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing (FCSE), Lisboa, Portugal.
Nuno PimentaUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisbon, Portugal.
Teresa SantosUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisbon, Portugal.
Susana Ganhão-ArranhadoUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisbon, Portugal.
Antti MäkitieUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula RavascoUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of the supplementation of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics as a therapeutic approach in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to critically examine the current scientific evidence on the impact of modulating the microbiota, through the use of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics, in patients diagnosed with CRC undergoing treatment, to determine the potential therapeutic use of this approach. Methods: This systematic review was made according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the impact of pre-, pro-, or synbiotic supplementation with placebo or standard care in patients with CRC undergoing treatment. Exclusion criteria were non-human studies, non-RCTs, and studies in languages other than English or Portuguese. Six databases were consulted, namely, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Scopus, Cinahl, MedicLatina and Web of Science until May of 2023. RAYYAN software was used to manage the search results and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using the Rob 2.0 tool. Results: Twenty-four RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Administration of pre-, pro-, or synbiotics improved surgical outcomes such as the incidence of infectious and non-infectious postoperative complications, return to normal gut function, hospital length of stay, and antibiotic usage. The supplementation of these microorganisms also alleviated some symptoms from chemotherapy and radiotherapy, mainly diarrhea. Evidence on the best approach in terms of types of strains, dosage and duration of intervention is still scarce. Conclusions: Pre-, pro-, and synbiotics supplementation appears to be a beneficial therapeutic approach in CRC treatment to improve surgical outcomes and to alleviate side-effects such as treatment toxicity. More RCTs with larger sample sizes and less heterogeneity are needed to confirm these potential benefits and to determine the best strains, dosage, and duration of administration in each situation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023413958.

Indexed as

colorectal neoplasmsmicrobiotaprebioticsprobioticssynbioticssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38807764
PMCPMC11130488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.