ArticleCurrent issues in personality psychology2024
The underlying structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): a general factor of personality psychopathology.
Article in Current issues in personality psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations Between Childhood Trauma and Personality Functioning and Maladaptive Personality Trait Domains in South Korea: An Alternative DSM-5 Model Approach.Personality and mental health · 2026Article
- A Network Analysis of Personality Traits in Adults with and Without Specific Learning Disorders.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
- Emotion-focused vs. cognitive interventions of schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: effects on neural emotion regulation networks - study protocol.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
- Comparing DSM-5 Pathological Personality Traits in Youths With ADHD, Subthreshold ADHD, and Healthy Controls Using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): A Network Analysis Study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe psychopathology of personality is currently undergoing a paradigm shift from a categorical to a dimensional approach. This work aimed to study the underlying structure of pathological personality traits of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). For this purpose, the internal structure of a version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was examined by a confirmatory factor analysis. This version assesses the five higher-order pathological personality domains (negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 lower-order pathological personality facets through a reduced number of items. Four alternative models were compared: five-factor oblique; second-order (five first-order factors and one second-order factor); bifactor (five specific factors and a general factor), and one-factor. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: We worked with an Argentinean sample of
resultsThe five-factor model was slightly superior to the second order model, and the bifactor model presented the best fit.
conclusionsThese findings, while preliminary, suggest that the PID-5 facets could reflect five specific pathological personality traits (which correspond to AMPD domains) but also a general factor (which would reflect a general propensity for psychopathology).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.