ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Quality Improvement Identifies Healthcare Transition Disparities in Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease and Disabilities.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-perceived importance and confidence of adolescents transitioning to adult care.Health care transitions · 2025Article
- A Standardized Approach to Transition Improves Care of Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: We aim to implement healthcare transition (HCT) education for youth with congenital heart disease (CHD) and assess HCT preparedness for cardiac self-care. Methods: An HCT clinic was implemented at an academic pediatric cardiology clinic for CHD youth 17 years of age and older. An educator used transition readiness assessment questionnaires and discussed HCT material. The percentage of eligible youth who received HCT education and the cause for missed occurrences were tracked. Plan-do-study-act cycles began in August 2020 to improve the number of youths reached. Secondary analyses assessed improvement differences among those without cardiac procedures or disabilities. Results: HCT education provision improved from a mean of 38% to 73% in the 17-year and older age group by December 2022. Communication failure was the leading cause of missed visits in 2021 (30%), reduced to 0 by 2022 following plan-do-study-act cycles. Other missed HCT visits included clinic add-ons after screening, limited staff availability, and unidentified eligibility. Readiness assessments were similar for youth with and without prior cardiac procedures, for example, confidence in taking charge of their health care ( Conclusions: Implementation of a CHD HCT clinic improved successful education delivery. Provider engagement and clinic staffing are important for sustainability. HCT knowledge gaps exist for all adolescents, yet those with disabilities had the greatest deficits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.