ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Cardiac length-dependent activation driven by force-dependent thick-filament dynamics.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetic modeling of mant-ATP turnover to interpret the biochemically defined myosin SRX state.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- The CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Human atrial skinned muscle fibers exhibit reduced length-dependent activation but show faster force development kinetics than ventricular muscle.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026Article
- Materials and measurement in mechanobiology.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Characteristics of Sarcomere Proteins in Myocardial Sleeves of the Superior Vena Cava and Pulmonary Veins of the Porcine Heart.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Interatrial Features of Length-Dependent Regulation of Myocardial Force in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Rats.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Modeling autoregulation of cardiac excitation-Ca-contraction and arrhythmogenic activities in response to mechanical load changes.iScience · 2025Article
- Super-relaxed or super-stressed: Modeling length-dependent activation in cardiac muscle.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The length-dependent activation (LDA) of maximum force and calcium sensitivity are established features of cardiac muscle contraction but the dominant underlying mechanisms remain to be fully clarified. Alongside the well-documented regulation of contraction via the thin filaments, experiments have identified an additional force-dependent thick-filament activation, whereby myosin heads parked in a so-called off state become available to generate force. This process produces a feedback effect that may potentially drive LDA. Using biomechanical modeling of a human left-ventricular myocyte, this study investigates the extent to which the off-state dynamics could, by itself, plausibly account for LDA, depending on the specific mathematical formulation of the feedback. We hypothesized four different models of the off-state regulatory feedback based on (A) total force, (B) active force, (C) sarcomere strain, and (D) passive force. We tested if these models could reproduce the isometric steady-state and dynamic LDA features predicted by an earlier published model of a human left-ventricle myocyte featuring purely phenomenological length dependences. The results suggest that only total-force feedback (A) is capable of reproducing the expected behaviors, but that passive tension could provide a length-dependent signal on which to initiate the feedback. Furthermore, by attributing LDA to off-state dynamics, our proposed model also qualitatively reproduces experimentally observed effects of the off-state-stabilizing drug mavacamten. Taken together, these results support off-state dynamics as a plausible primary mechanism underlying LDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.