Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38807299›Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2024

MiR-106a targets ATG7 to inhibit autophagy and angiogenesis after myocardial infarction.

Guofeng Bai, Jinghao Yang, Weili Liao, Xiaofeng Zhou, Yingting He, Nian Li, Liuhong Zhang, Yifei Wang, Xiaoli Dong, Hao Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. LncRNAiScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Guofeng BaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Jinghao YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-2172
Weili LiaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofeng ZhouGuangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yingting HeGuangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Nian LiGuangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Liuhong ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Yifei WangGuangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoli DongDepartment of Cardiology, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan Clinical Medicine Research Institution, Haikou, People's Republic of China.
Hao ZhangGuangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jinchun PanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Liangxue LaiKey Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolong YuanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Xilong WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Breed Industry Innovation Park of Guangdong Xiaoerhua Pig 2022-4408X1-43010402-0019Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515010873Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2022A1515011455Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation 818MS132National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial infarction (MI) is an acute condition in which the heart muscle dies due to the lack of blood supply. Previous research has suggested that autophagy and angiogenesis play vital roles in the prevention of heart failure after MI, and miR-106a is considered to be an important regulatory factor in MI. But the specific mechanism remains unknown. In this study, using cultured venous endothelial cells and a rat model of MI, we aimed to identify the potential target genes of miR-106a and discover the mechanisms of inhibiting autophagy and angiogenesis.

methodsWe first explored the biological functions of miR-106a on autophagy and angiogenesis on endothelial cells. Then we identified ATG7, which was the downstream target gene of miR-106a. The expression of miR-106a and ATG7 was investigated in the rat model of MI.

resultsWe found that miR-106a inhibits the proliferation, cell cycle, autophagy and angiogenesis, but promoted the apoptosis of vein endothelial cells. Moreover, ATG7 was identified as the target of miR-106a, and ATG7 rescued the inhibition of autophagy and angiogenesis by miR-106a. The expression of miR-106a in the rat model of MI was decreased but the expression of ATG7 was increased in the infarction areas.

conclusionOur results indicate that miR-106a may inhibit autophagy and angiogenesis by targeting ATG7. This mechanism may be a potential therapeutic treatment for MI.

Indexed as

AutophagyAutophagy-Related Protein 7MicroRNAsMyocardial InfarctionAngiogenesisAnimalsApoptosisCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalEndothelial CellsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMaleNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicAtg7 protein, ratAutophagy-Related Protein 7MicroRNAsMIRN106 microRNA, humanangiogenesisATG7autophagymiR‐106amiRNAsmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID38807299
PMCPMC11369033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.