Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38807106›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on physician-scientist trainees to faculty one year into the pandemic.

Aleksandar Obradovic, Omar Toubat, Nathan W Chen, Aisha Siebert, Caroline Jansen, Briana Christophers, Etienne Leveille, Evan Noch, Jennifer M Kwan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aleksandar Obradovic *Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. azo2104@cumc.columbia.edu.
Omar Toubat *Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. omar.toubat@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Nathan W ChenYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Aisha SiebertDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Caroline JansenEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Briana ChristophersWeill Cornell-Rockefeller-Sloan Kettering Tri Institutional MD/PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.
Etienne LeveilleSections of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Evan NochDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. evan.noch@gmail.com.
Jennifer M KwanSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 300 George St Suite 759, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. jennifer.kwan@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering MST ProgramT32GM152349 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KATHARINE C HSU · 2024 to 2026
$6.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysician-scientists play a crucial role in advancing biomedical sciences. Proportionally fewer physicians are actively engaged in scientific pursuits, attributed to attrition in the training and retention pipeline. This national study evaluated the ongoing and longer-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress levels, research productivity, and optimism for physician-scientists at all levels of training.

methodsA multi-institutional cross-sectional survey of medical students, graduate students, and residents/fellows/junior faculty (RFJF) was conducted from April to August 2021 to assess the impact of COVID-19 on individual stress, productivity, and optimism. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify associated variables and unsupervised variable clustering techniques were employed to identify highly correlated responses.

resultsA total 677 respondents completed the survey, representing different stages of physician-scientist training. Respondents report high levels of stress (medical students: 85%, graduate students: 63%, RFJF: 85%) attributed to impaired productivity concerns, concern about health of family and friends, impact on personal health and impairment in training or career development. Many cited impaired productivity (medical students: 65% graduate students: 79%, RFJF: 78%) associated with pandemic impacts on training, labs closures and loss of facility/resource access, and social isolation. Optimism levels were low (medical students: 37%, graduate students: 38% and RFJF: 39%) with females less likely to be optimistic and more likely to report concerns of long-term effects of COVID-19. Optimism about the future was correlated with not worrying about the long-term effects of COVID-19. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, all respondents reported increased prioritization of time with family/friends (67%) and personal health (62%) over career (25%) and research (24%).

conclusionsThis national survey highlights the significant and protracted impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress levels, productivity, and optimism among physician-scientists and trainees. These findings underscore the urgent need for tailored support, including mental health, academic, and career development assistance for this biomedical workforce.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCOVID-19Students, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleOptimismPandemicsPhysiciansResearch PersonnelSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomedical researchCOVID-19Medical educationPhysician-scientist

Identifiers

PMID38807106
PMCPMC11134762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.