Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38807017›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2024

C-Reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio Predicts Objective Response to Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Taizo Uchimoto, Takuya Matsuda, Kazumasa Komura, Wataru Fukuokaya, Takahiro Adachi, Yosuke Hirasawa, Takeshi Hashimoto, Atsuhiko Yoshizawa, Masanobu Saruta, Mamoru Hashimoto and 22 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Taizo Uchimoto *Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya Matsuda *Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Kazumasa KomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan. kazumasa.komura@ompu.ac.jp.
Wataru FukuokayaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Takahiro AdachiDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke HirasawaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuhiko YoshizawaDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi Nagoya, Japan.
Masanobu SarutaDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi Nagoya, Japan.
Mamoru HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya HigashioDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Shuya TsuchidaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuki NishimuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya TsujinoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Ko NakamuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuo FukushimaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Kyosuke NishioDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Shutaro YamamotoDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Kosuke IwataniDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Fumihiko UrabeDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Takafumi YanagisawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Shunsuke TsudukiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Kiyoshi TakaharaDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi Nagoya, Japan.
Teruo InamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Jun MikiDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan. tkimura0809@gmail.com.
Yoshio OhnoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryoichi ShirokiDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi Nagoya, Japan.
Hirotsugu UemuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Haruhito AzumaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H03070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4, is used for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have experienced progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. Despite the widespread use of the drug, evidence remains scarce regarding clinical indicators that can predict the response to EV treatment.

objectiveWe aimed to explore the predictive value of clinical indicators derived from peripheral blood tests for treatment responses to EV.

methodsWe utilized records of 109 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated by EV from our multi-institutional dataset. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for predicting objective responses including several indicators from blood examinations, such as C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR), hemoglobin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and lactate dehydrogenase, were performed. The optimal cutoff points were determined by the Youden index. Logistic regression analyses for achieving objective responses to EV treatment were performed among these indicators.

resultsThe median age of the cohort was 74 years, and the median follow-up duration was 10 months for the entire group. Median overall survival and progression-free survival from the initiation of EV were 12 and 6 months, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 48% and 70%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis aimed at predicting the achievement of an objective response to EV showed that the concordant index for the CAR was 0.774, significantly surpassing other indicators such as hemoglobin level, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and serum lactate dehydrogenase. The Youden index identified an optimal cutoff value of 1 for CAR (mg/L for C-reactive protein and g/dL for serum albumin level) in predicting the objective response to EV treatment. Using the cutoff value for the CAR, the cohort was divided into 32 patients (29%) with lower CAR and 77 patients (71%) with higher CAR. The objective response rate was observed to be 84% in the lower CAR group and 32% in the higher CAR group (p < 0.0001). A logistic regression analysis revealed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥1 (p = 0.04) and a CAR ≥1 (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors for the objective response to EV.

conclusionsThe evaluation of the CAR from a concise blood examination at the initiation of EV could effectively predict the treatment response to EV in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma after the progression of platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalC-Reactive ProteinAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalC-Reactive Proteinenfortumab vedotin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.