Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38806860›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2024

Morphological aspects and the effectiveness of photodynamic inactivation against Rhizopus oryzae in different life cycles.

M J A M Marques, F Alves, M H S Sousa, F E G Guimarães, C Kurachi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M J A M MarquesSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
F AlvesSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
M H S SousaSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
F E G GuimarãesSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
C KurachiSão Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil. cristina@ifsc.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-5337

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305176/2021-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465360/2014-9Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.601513/2021-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2009/54035-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/07276-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/50857-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/01324-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucormycosis is an extremely aggressive fungal disease with a high mortality rate, especially in people with compromised immune systems. Most cases of mucormycosis are caused by the fungus Rhizopus oryzae. The treatments used are based on high doses of antifungals, associated with surgical resections, when it is possible. However, even with this aggressive treatment, the estimated attributable mortality rate is high. There is therefore a need to develop adjuvant treatments. Photodynamic Inactivation (PDI) may be an auxiliary therapeutic option for mucormycosis. Due to the lack of reports in the literature on the morphology and photodynamic inactivation of R. oryzae, characterization of the fungus using Confocal Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy, and different protocols using Photodithazine® (PDZ), a chlorin e6 compound, as a photosensitizer, were performed. The fungus growth rate under different concentrations and incubation times of the photosensitizer and its association with the surfactant Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) was evaluated. For the hyphae, both in the light and dark phases, in the protocols using only PDZ, no effective photodynamic response was observed. Meanwhile with the combination of SDS 0.05% and PDZ, inhibition growth rates of 98% and 72% were achieved for the white and black phase, respectively. In the conidia phase, only a 1.7 log

Indexed as

Photosensitizing AgentsRhizopus oryzaeAntifungal AgentsLightMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhotochemotherapyPorphyrinsSodium Dodecyl SulfateAntifungal AgentsPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsSodium Dodecyl SulfateChlorinMelaninMucormycosisPhotodynamic inactivationRhizopus oryzae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.