Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38806826›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Peroperative Cooling in Rhinoplasty: Does it Differ?

Goksel Turhal, Veysel Berber, Efe Isler, Sercan Gode

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Goksel TurhalDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Veysel BerberDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sarikamis State Hospital, 36500, Kars, Turkey. drveyselberber@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0427-2882
Efe IslerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Sercan GodeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main causes of ecchymosis and edema are osteotomy (bone manipulation), dissection of subcutaneous tissue, and skin manipulation in the rhinoplasty procedure. Eyelid edema following surgery can potentially affect visual acuity, particularly during the initial twenty-four hours after the procedure. These may also delay the patient's return to their normal social life therefore hampering their quality of life. Various surgical and medical methods have been reported to address these issues. This study aimed to compare the effects of using cold saline (0-4 °C) versus room temperature saline (20-25 °C) irrigation throughout the surgery on postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and pain. Fifty patients who underwent open-approach primary rhinoplasty between August 2022 and August 2023 at a tertiary academic center were included. Fifty patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on using cold saline (0-4 °C) (group 1) or room temperature saline (20-25 °C) (group 2) during surgical site irrigation. Patients were assessed for pain, edema, and bruising using a VAS (Visual Analog Scale) on the second and seventh postoperative days. Visual analog score (VAS) was used for subjective outcome analyses. Each patient scored the severity of their periorbital ecchymosis on day two and seven. Periorbital ecchymosis was also evaluated on the second and seventh postoperative days using the SPREE (Surgeon Periorbital Rating of Edema and Ecchymosis) scale. On the second postoperative day, the VAS pain score in group 1, where cold water was used, was found to be statistically and significantly different from the control group (group 2) (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups when comparing the VAS pain scores on the seventh postoperative day. Regarding the VAS ecchymosis score on the seventh postoperative day, there was a statistically significant difference favoring group 1 (p < 0.05). The SPREE scale data also indicated that group 1 had significantly lower scores on the seventh day (p < 0.05). While the SPREE scores on the second day were lower in group 1 than in group 2, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.061). The findings from our study show that cold saline irrigation may contribute to intraoperative hemostasis by inducing local vasoconstriction. We observed that intraoperative bleeding decreased with the use of cold saline. This approach has the potential to improve patient satisfaction and overall quality of life by reducing postoperative ecchymosis without significantly increasing the cost of the surgical procedure.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureEcchymosisEdemaPostoperative ComplicationsRhinoplastySaline SolutionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainQuality of LifeTherapeutic IrrigationTreatment OutcomeSaline SolutionColdCoolingEcchymosisEdemaPainRhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID38806826
PMCPMC11739320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.