Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38806508›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

EpCAM-CD24+ circulating cells associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients.

V M Perelmuter, E S Grigoryeva, O E Savelieva, V V Alifanov, E S Andruhova, M V Zavyalova, O D Bragina, E Yu Garbukov, M E Menyailo, A A Khozyainova and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

V M PerelmuterThe Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
E S GrigoryevaThe Laboratory of Molecular Therapy of Cancer, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia. grigoryeva.es@gmail.com.
O E SavelievaThe Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
V V AlifanovThe Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
E S AndruhovaThe Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
M V ZavyalovaThe Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
O D BraginaThe Department of General Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
E Yu GarbukovThe Department of General Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
M E MenyailoThe Laboratory of Cancer Progression Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
A A KhozyainovaThe Laboratory of Cancer Progression Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
E V DenisovThe Laboratory of Cancer Progression Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
N V CherdyntsevaThe Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
L A TashirevaThe Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-15-00135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the discovery of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood of cancer patients, CTCs were initially postulated to hold promise as a valuable prognostic tool through liquid biopsy. However, a decade and a half of accumulated data have revealed significant complexities in the investigation of CTCs. A challenging aspect lies in the reduced expression or complete loss of key epithelial markers during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This likely hampers the identification of a pathogenetically significant subset of CTCs. Nevertheless, there is a growing body of evidence regarding the prognostic value of such molecules as CD24 expressing in the primary breast tumor. Herewith, the exact relevance of CD24 expression on CTCs remains unclear. We used two epithelial markers (EpCAM and cytokeratin 7/8) to assess the count of CTCs in 57 breast cancer patients, both with (M0

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingAdultAgedEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansKeratin-7Keratin-8Middle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCD24 protein, humanEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeKeratin-7Keratin-8

Identifiers

PMID38806508
PMCPMC11133449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.