ArticleBMJ open2024
Efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in microscopic modified radical mastoidectomy: a study protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadical mastoidectomy is a common procedure for chronic suppurative otitis media, typically performed under a microscope. The smooth operation is closely related to the clarity of the operative field. Our trial is designed to investigate whether the intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) can improve the clarity of the operative field, reduce the operative time, and increase surgeon satisfaction. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial that aims to investigate the effects of TXA on patients with otitis media. The trial will include patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who will be randomly assigned to either the TXA group or the control group. In the TXA group, patients will receive 1 g of TXA diluted to 20 mL of normal saline before anaesthesia induction while the control group will receive 20 mL of normal saline. The primary outcome measure will be the Modena Bleeding Score, which will assess the clarity of the surgical field. Secondary outcomes will include the surgeon's satisfaction with surgical conditions, operation time, laboratory measurements (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrin degradation products, D-dimer) and levels of inflammatory factors (such as IL-6) at 24 hours postoperatively. In addition, the incidence of general adverse reactions such as postoperative nausea, vomiting and dizziness; serious adverse events such as arterial and venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction and epilepsy within 90 days will be compared between the two groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (2021PHB173-001), on 19 July 2021. The trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100049183.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.