Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38806224›Full record

ArticleRespiratory care2024

Barriers to Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Carolyn L Rochester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effectiveness of message framing on pulmonary rehabilitation behavior for lung cancer surgery patients: Randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Geriatric respiratory medicine 2026: from artificial intelligence to personalised management of the multimorbid patient.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Who Enrolls After Referral to Virtual Pulmonary Rehabilitation? A Descriptive Comparison.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carolyn L RochesterSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine and Yale COPD Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut. Carolyn.rochester@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is one of the most effective therapies for chronic respiratory diseases, yet it is significantly underutilized. There are several patient-related, geographic, societal, and health system-related barriers to PR. People with chronic respiratory disease face a collectively high burden of treatments including health care provider visits, medications, oxygen and other durable medical equipment, and providers' recommendation to undertake PR may be considered an added burden more than a likely benefit. Transportation difficulties, lack of insurance coverage, competing time priorities, low knowledge of PR, lack of perceived likely benefit, comorbidities, and other factors also pose obstacles to participation in PR for patients. Geographic availability of PR is heterogenous; in the United States, out-patient center-based PR programs are often not available within close proximity to patients' residence, posing barriers to patients' access to it. PR programs are lacking altogether in many areas; rural areas are particularly affected. Existing PR programs are often poorly funded and underresourced. Socioeconomic and racial disparities also influence patients' likelihood of receiving PR. Also, health care professionals (HCPs) often do not refer their patients with chronic respiratory disease to PR, owing to a lack of knowledge and awareness of its content and benefits, patient candidacy, or of the referral process. A limited number of multidisciplinary HCPs trained in PR likely also contributes to limited access to PR for patients. Collectively, these multifaceted barriers to PR create unacceptable health care disparities. Strategies to address barriers to PR are urgently needed in order to enable individuals who need to receive it.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityChronic DiseaseHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLung DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statesaccessbarrierschronic respiratory diseasesgeographichealth-systempatientpulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38806224
PMCPMC11147625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.