Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38806209›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Hidden systems in primary care cancer detection: an embedded qualitative intervention development study.

Julia Hiscock, Rebecca-Jane Law, Kate Brain, Stephanie Smits, Sadia Nafees, Nefyn H Williams, Jan Rose, Ruth Lewis, Jessica L Roberts, Annie Hendry and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julia HiscockNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0002-8963-2981
Rebecca-Jane LawNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-5086
Kate BrainDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-9748
Stephanie SmitsDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-150X
Sadia NafeesNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-3013
Nefyn H WilliamsDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-409X
Jan RoseNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.
Ruth LewisNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0003-0745-995X
Jessica L RobertsNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0002-3271-1814
Annie HendryNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-1368
Richard D NealDISCO (Diagnosis of Symptomatic Cancer Optimally), University of Exeter, Exeter.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-2744
Clare WilkinsonNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-8078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK cancer mortality is worse than in many other high-income countries, partly because of diagnostic delays in primary care.

aimTo understand beliefs and behaviours of GPs, and systems of general practice teams, to inform the Think Cancer! intervention development. DESIGN AND

settingAn embedded qualitative study guided by behaviour change models (COM-B [Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour] and theoretical domains framework [TDF]) in primary care in Wales, UK.

methodTwenty qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs were undertaken and four face-to-face focus groups held with practice teams. Framework analysis was used and results were mapped to multiple, overlapping components of COM-B and TDF.

resultsThree themes illustrate complex, multilevel referral considerations facing GPs and practice teams; external influences and constraints; and the role of practice systems and culture. Tensions emerged between individual considerations of GPs (Capability and Motivation) and context-dependent external pressures (Opportunity). Detecting cancer was guided not only by external requirements, but also by motivational factors GPs described as part of their cancer diagnostics process. External influences on the diagnosis process often resulted from the primary-secondary care interface and social pressures. GPs adapted their behaviour to deal with this disconnect. Positive practice culture and supportive practice-based systems ameliorated these tensions and complexity.

conclusionBy exploring individual GP behaviours together with practice systems and culture we contribute new understanding about how cancer diagnosis operates in primary care and how delays can be improved. We highlight commonly overlooked dynamics and tensions that are experienced by GPs as a tension between individual decision making (Capability and Motivation) and external considerations, such as pressures in secondary care (Opportunity).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEarly Detection of CancerNeoplasmsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMotivationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationWalescancerdecision makingdelayed diagnosisearly diagnosisgeneral practiceWales

Identifiers

PMID38806209
PMCPMC11257065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.