Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805753›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2024

DUVEL: an active-learning annotated biomedical corpus for the recognition of oligogenic combinations.

Charlotte Nachtegael, Jacopo De Stefani, Anthony Cnudde, Tom Lenaerts

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. LSD600: the first corpus of biomedical abstracts annotated with lifestyle-disease relations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte NachtegaelInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Boulevard du Triomphe, CP 263, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5034-8975
Jacopo De StefaniMachine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe, CP 212, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0257-4537
Anthony CnuddeMachine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe, CP 212, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-6506
Tom LenaertsInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Boulevard du Triomphe, CP 263, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-1455

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 35276964Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS 2.5020.11Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek I002819NInnoviris 2020 RDIR 55bService Public de Wallonie 2010235-ARIAC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While biomedical relation extraction (bioRE) datasets have been instrumental in the development of methods to support biocuration of single variants from texts, no datasets are currently available for the extraction of digenic or even oligogenic variant relations, despite the reports in literature that epistatic effects between combinations of variants in different loci (or genes) are important to understand disease etiologies. This work presents the creation of a unique dataset of oligogenic variant combinations, geared to train tools to help in the curation of scientific literature. To overcome the hurdles associated with the number of unlabelled instances and the cost of expertise, active learning (AL) was used to optimize the annotation, thus getting assistance in finding the most informative subset of samples to label. By pre-annotating 85 full-text articles containing the relevant relations from the Oligogenic Diseases Database (OLIDA) with PubTator, text fragments featuring potential digenic variant combinations, i.e. gene-variant-gene-variant, were extracted. The resulting fragments of texts were annotated with ALAMBIC, an AL-based annotation platform. The resulting dataset, called DUVEL, is used to fine-tune four state-of-the-art biomedical language models: BiomedBERT, BiomedBERT-large, BioLinkBERT and BioM-BERT. More than 500 000 text fragments were considered for annotation, finally resulting in a dataset with 8442 fragments, 794 of them being positive instances, covering 95% of the original annotated articles. When applied to gene-variant pair detection, BiomedBERT-large achieves the highest F1 score (0.84) after fine-tuning, demonstrating significant improvement compared to the non-fine-tuned model, underlining the relevance of the DUVEL dataset. This study shows how AL may play an important role in the creation of bioRE dataset relevant for biomedical curation applications. DUVEL provides a unique biomedical corpus focusing on 4-ary relations between two genes and two variants. It is made freely available for research on GitHub and Hugging Face. Database URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/cnachteg/duvel or https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/1571.

Indexed as

Supervised Machine LearningDatabases, GeneticData CurationData MiningHumans

Identifiers

PMID38805753
PMCPMC11131422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.