Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805659›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

Clinical research nurses perceive their role as being like the hub of a wheel without real power: Empirical qualitative research.

Beatrice Backman Lönn, Åsa Hornsten, Johan Styrke, Senada Hajdarevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  4. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beatrice Backman LönnDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-1297
Åsa HornstenDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Johan StyrkeDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Senada HajdarevicDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-8269

Funding

Region VästernorrlandStiftelsen Emil Andersson fond för medicinsk forskning
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to explore the experiences of being a clinical research nurse (CRN), in Sweden.

designA qualitative study analysing individual interview data.

methodsInterviews with 10 participants were conducted in April 2017 and repeated with five participants in May 2022. A semi-structured interview guide was used to cover topics such as experiences of working in a new role and professional challenges related to the role. The transcribed interviews were analysed inductively using qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe main theme revealed that the CRNs experienced their work role as being like a hub in a wheel, using an ethical compass, but without real power. The six themes identified showed that CRNs worked independently and relied on clinical experiences as nurses but needed more education. They not only had a sense of duty but also too large responsibilities. Furthermore, they viewed their work as valuable and important. However, they needed an accentuated ethical compass and were also affected by power relations that negatively impacted work.

conclusionWorking as a CRN means being in a central position and working independently, which requires diverse skills and competencies. CRNs, however, face and manage complex ethical and practical challenges without real power. They experience huge responsibilities but need education and acknowledgement, indicating a need for improvement. This is an important message to stakeholders and managers about the necessity of taking adequate action to support CRNs who are crucial resources in clinical research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Nurse's RoleQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelEmpirical ResearchFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSwedenclinical research nurseclinical study coordinatorinterviewsnurseprofessional developmentqualitativerole

Identifiers

PMID38805659
PMCPMC11132672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.