Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805609›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Prediction of hypertension and diabetes in twin pregnancy using machine learning model based on characteristics at first prenatal visit: national registry study.

H J Mustafa, E Kalafat, S Prasad, M-H Heydari, R N Nunge, A Khalil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H J MustafaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-0547
E KalafatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-138X
S PrasadFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-4470
M-H HeydariNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
R N NungeIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2802-7670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a prediction model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancy using characteristics obtained at the first prenatal visit.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study using national live-birth data in the USA between 2016 and 2021. The association of all prenatal candidate variables with HDP and GDM was tested on univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Prediction models were built with generalized linear models using the logit link function and classification and regression tree (XGboost) machine learning algorithm. Performance was assessed with repeated 2-fold cross-validation and the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated. A P value < 0.001 was considered statistically significant.

resultsA total of 707 198 twin pregnancies were included in the HDP analysis and 723 882 twin pregnancies were included in the GDM analysis. The incidence of HDP and GDM increased significantly from 12.6% and 8.1%, respectively, in 2016 to 16.0% and 10.7%, respectively, in 2021. Factors associated with increased odds of HDP in twin pregnancy were maternal age < 20 years or ≥ 35 years, infertility treatment, prepregnancy diabetes mellitus, non-Hispanic Black race, overweight prepregnancy BMI, prepregnancy obesity and Medicaid as the payment source for delivery (P < 0.001 for all). Obesity Class II and III more than doubled the odds of HDP. Factors associated with increased odds of GDM in twin pregnancy were maternal age ≤ 24 years or ≥ 30 years, infertility treatment, prepregnancy hypertension, non-Hispanic Asian race, maternal birthplace outside the USA and prepregnancy obesity (P < 0.001 for all). Maternal age ≥ 30 years, non-Hispanic Asian race and obesity Class I, II and III more than doubled the odds of GDM. For both HDP and GDM, the performances of the machine learning model and logistic regression model were mostly similar, with negligible differences in the performance domains tested. The mean ± SD AUCs of the final machine learning models for HDP and GDM were 0.620 ± 0.001 and 0.671 ± 0.001, respectively.

conclusionsThe incidence of HDP and GDM in twin pregnancies in the USA is increasing. The predictive accuracy of the machine learning models for HDP and GDM in twin pregnancies was similar to that of the logistic regression models. The models for HDP and GDM had modest predictive performance, were well calibrated and did not have poor fit. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedMachine LearningPregnancy, TwinAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidencePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal CareRegistriesRisk FactorsUnited Statesartificial intelligencecross‐sectional studygestational diabetes mellitusgestational hypertensionmachine learningpre‐eclampsiatwin pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38805609
PMCPMC12047682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.