Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805522›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The interplay of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in dual-species biofilms impacts development, antibiotic resistance and virulence of biofilms in in vitro wound infection models.

Pia Katharina Vestweber, Jana Wächter, Viktoria Planz, Nathalie Jung, Maike Windbergs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Preparing a Dual-SpeciesMolecular pharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pia Katharina VestweberInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-3383
Jana WächterInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4961-0059
Viktoria PlanzInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nathalie JungInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-6470
Maike WindbergsInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9475-699X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to high tolerance to antibiotics and pronounced virulence, bacterial biofilms are considered a key factor and major clinical challenge in persistent wound infections. They are typically composed of multiple species, whose interactions determine the biofilm's structural development, functional properties and thus the progression of wound infections. However, most attempts to study bacterial biofilms in vitro solely rely on mono-species populations, since cultivating multi-species biofilms, especially for prolonged periods of time, poses significant challenges. To address this, the present study examined the influence of bacterial composition on structural biofilm development, morphology and spatial organization, as well as antibiotic tolerance and virulence on human skin cells in the context of persistent wound infections. By creating a wound-mimetic microenvironment, the successful cultivation of dual-species biofilms of two of the most prevalent wound pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, was realized over a period of 72 h. Combining quantitative analysis with electron microscopy and label-free imaging enabled a comprehensive evaluation of the dynamics of biofilm formation and matrix secretion, revealing a twofold increased maturation of dual-species biofilms. Antibiotic tolerance was comparable for both mono-species cultures, however, dual-species communities showed a 50% increase in tolerance, mediated by a significantly reduced penetration of the applied antibiotic into the biofilm matrix. Further synergistic effects were observed, where dual-species biofilms exacerbated wound healing beyond the effects observed from either Pseudomonas or Staphylococcus. Consequently, predicting biofilm development, antimicrobial tolerance and virulence for multi-species biofilms based solely on the results from mono-species biofilms is unreliable. This study underscores the substantial impact of a multi-species composition on biofilm functional properties and emphasizes the need to tailor future studies reflecting the bacterial composition of the respective in vivo situation, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of microbial communities in the context of basic microbiology and the development of effective treatments.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusWound InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsVirulenceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38805522
PMCPMC11132468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.