ArticlePLoS biology2024
The human auditory system uses amplitude modulation to distinguish music from speech.
Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Music Is Quasi-Rhythmic Too: Comparing Bandwidth in Speech and Music Acoustic Modulation Spectra.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Music is a distinct perceptual category with subjective grounds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Contrastive adaptation in perception of speech versus song.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Singing to the newborn brain uncovers early traces of specialized neural networks.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Individual differences in musical melody perception moderate the speech-to-song illusion in Mandarin Chinese listeners.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep Sound Synthesis Matched to Brain Activity Recapitulates Preferential Responses to Speech and Music.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- CoVox: A dataset of contrasting vocalizations.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Measuring self-similarity in empirical signals to understand musical beat perception.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Evidence for a shared cognitive mechanism underlying relative rhythmic and melodic perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Speech and Melody Processing Among Mandarin Speakers.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Music and speech are complex and distinct auditory signals that are both foundational to the human experience. The mechanisms underpinning each domain are widely investigated. However, what perceptual mechanism transforms a sound into music or speech and how basic acoustic information is required to distinguish between them remain open questions. Here, we hypothesized that a sound's amplitude modulation (AM), an essential temporal acoustic feature driving the auditory system across processing levels, is critical for distinguishing music and speech. Specifically, in contrast to paradigms using naturalistic acoustic signals (that can be challenging to interpret), we used a noise-probing approach to untangle the auditory mechanism: If AM rate and regularity are critical for perceptually distinguishing music and speech, judging artificially noise-synthesized ambiguous audio signals should align with their AM parameters. Across 4 experiments (N = 335), signals with a higher peak AM frequency tend to be judged as speech, lower as music. Interestingly, this principle is consistently used by all listeners for speech judgments, but only by musically sophisticated listeners for music. In addition, signals with more regular AM are judged as music over speech, and this feature is more critical for music judgment, regardless of musical sophistication. The data suggest that the auditory system can rely on a low-level acoustic property as basic as AM to distinguish music from speech, a simple principle that provokes both neurophysiological and evolutionary experiments and speculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.