Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805517›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

The human auditory system uses amplitude modulation to distinguish music from speech.

Andrew Chang, Xiangbin Teng, M Florencia Assaneo, David Poeppel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contrastive adaptation in perception of speech versus song.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep Sound Synthesis Matched to Brain Activity Recapitulates Preferential Responses to Speech and Music.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. CoVox: A dataset of contrasting vocalizations.Behavior research methods · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew ChangDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-4435
Xiangbin TengDepartment of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
M Florencia AssaneoInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Juriquilla, Querétaro, México.
David PoeppelDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders/National Institutes of Health F32DC018205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music and speech are complex and distinct auditory signals that are both foundational to the human experience. The mechanisms underpinning each domain are widely investigated. However, what perceptual mechanism transforms a sound into music or speech and how basic acoustic information is required to distinguish between them remain open questions. Here, we hypothesized that a sound's amplitude modulation (AM), an essential temporal acoustic feature driving the auditory system across processing levels, is critical for distinguishing music and speech. Specifically, in contrast to paradigms using naturalistic acoustic signals (that can be challenging to interpret), we used a noise-probing approach to untangle the auditory mechanism: If AM rate and regularity are critical for perceptually distinguishing music and speech, judging artificially noise-synthesized ambiguous audio signals should align with their AM parameters. Across 4 experiments (N = 335), signals with a higher peak AM frequency tend to be judged as speech, lower as music. Interestingly, this principle is consistently used by all listeners for speech judgments, but only by musically sophisticated listeners for music. In addition, signals with more regular AM are judged as music over speech, and this feature is more critical for music judgment, regardless of musical sophistication. The data suggest that the auditory system can rely on a low-level acoustic property as basic as AM to distinguish music from speech, a simple principle that provokes both neurophysiological and evolutionary experiments and speculations.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionMusicSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38805517
PMCPMC11132470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.