ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Systematic evaluation of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase binding sites in apolipoproteins via peptide based nanodiscs: regulatory role of charged residues at positions 4 and 7.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LCAT acts as a molecular switch and regulates rooster sperm motility in vitro.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Effects of Liposome Composition and Size on Protein Corona Formation: Competitive Replacement of Abundant Proteins by High-Affinity Proteins on the Liposome Surface.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) exhibits α-activity on high-density and β-activity on low-density lipoproteins. However, the molecular determinants governing LCAT activation by different apolipoproteins remain elusive. Uncovering these determinants would offer the opportunity to design and explore advanced therapies against dyslipidemias. Here, we have conducted coarse-grained and all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of LCAT with nanodiscs made with α-helical amphiphilic peptides either derived from apolipoproteins A1 and E (apoA1 and apoE) or apoA1 mimetic peptide 22A that was optimized to activate LCAT. This study aims to explore what drives the binding of peptides to our previously identified interaction site in LCAT. We hypothesized that this approach could be used to screen for binding sites of LCAT in different apolipoproteins and would provide insights to differently localized LCAT activities. Our screening approach was able to discriminate apoA1 helixes 4, 6, and 7 as key contributors to the interaction with LCAT supporting the previous research data. The simulations provided detailed molecular determinants driving the interaction with LCAT: the formation of hydrogen bonds or salt bridges between peptides E4 or D4 and LCAT S236 or K238 residues. Additionally, salt bridging between R7 and D73 was observed, depending on the availability of R7. Expanding our investigation to diverse plasma proteins, we detected novel LCAT binding helixes in apoL1, apoB100, and serum amyloid A. Our findings suggest that the same binding determinants, involving E4 or D4 -S236 and R7-D73 interactions, influence LCAT β-activity on low-density lipoproteins, where apoE and or apoB100 are hypothesized to interact with LCAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.