Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805267›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Charge barriers in the kidney elimination of engineered nanoparticles.

Yingyu Huang, Mengxiao Yu, Jie Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nanoparticle Transport in Proximal Tubules with Rhabdomyolysis-Induced Necrosis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yingyu HuangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080.ORCID 0009-0009-5851-2125
Mengxiao YuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-8308
Jie ZhengDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080.

Funding

Glomerular Filtration of Sub-nm Gold NanoparticlesR01DK115986 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI ZHENG, JIE · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Unravel Nanoparticle Transport and Interactions in Renal Proximal TubulesR01DK124881 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI YU, MENGXIAO · 2020 to 2024
$1.4M
TEM for UT Southwestern Electron Microscopy Core FacilityS10OD021685 · OD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUBY-PHELPS, KATHERINE J · 2017 to 2017
$398k
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) RP200233HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) R01DK115986HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) R01DK124881NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115986NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124881NIH HHS S10 OD021685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The renal elimination pathway is increasingly harnessed to reduce nonspecific accumulation of engineered nanoparticles within the body and expedite their clinical applications. While the size of nanoparticles is recognized as crucial for their passive filtration through the glomerulus due to its limited pore size, the influence of nanoparticle charge on their transport and interactions within the kidneys remains largely elusive. Herein, we report that the proximal tubule and peritubular capillary, rather than the glomerulus, serve as primary charge barriers to the transport of charged nanoparticles within the kidney. Employing a series of ultrasmall, renal-clearable gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with precisely engineered surface charge characteristics as multimodal imaging agents, we have tracked their distribution and retention across various kidney components following intravenous administration. Our results reveal that retention in the proximal tubules is governed not by the nanoparticle's zeta-potential, but by direct Coulombic interactions between the positively charged surface ligands of the AuNPs and the negatively charged microvilli of proximal tubules. However, further enhancing these interactions leads to increased binding of the positively charged AuNPs to the peritubular capillaries during the initial phase of elimination, subsequently facilitating their slow passage through the glomeruli and interaction with tubular components in a charge-selective manner. By identifying these two critical charge-dependent barriers in the renal transport of nanoparticles, our findings offer a fundamental insight for the design of renal nanomedicines tailored for selective targeting within the kidney, laying down a foundation for developing targeting renal nanomedicines for future kidney disease management in the clinics.

Indexed as

GoldMetal NanoparticlesAnimalsKidneyKidney Tubules, ProximalMaleMiceRenal EliminationGoldcharge-selectivitydirect coulombic interactionkidneynanoparticlesspatial charge distribution

Identifiers

PMID38805267
PMCPMC11161793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.