Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805104›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Improving motion management in radiation therapy: findings from a workshop and survey in Australia and New Zealand.

Elizabeth Claridge Mackonis, Rachel Stensmyr, Rachel Poldy, Paul White, Zoë Moutrie, Tina Gorjiara, Erin Seymour, Tania Erven, Nicholas Hardcastle, Annette Haworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth Claridge MackonisUniversity of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. ecla2009@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7860-8073
Rachel StensmyrWestern Sydney LHD, Westmead, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1613-2265
Rachel PoldyCanberra Region Cancer Centre, Canberra, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1322-8808
Paul WhiteSouth Eastern Sydney LHD, Randwick, Australia.
Zoë MoutrieSouth Western Sydney Cancer Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-5384
Tina GorjiaraIcon Cancer Care, Bella Vista, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3277-2828
Erin SeymourCentral Coast LHD, Gosford, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-6213
Tania ErvenSouth Western Sydney Cancer Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas HardcastlePeter MacCallum Cancer Centres, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-8472
Annette HaworthInstitute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-7747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion management has become an integral part of radiation therapy. Multiple approaches to motion management have been reported in the literature. To allow the sharing of experiences on current practice and emerging technology, the University of Sydney and the New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory branch of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) held a two-day motion management workshop. To inform the workshop program, participants were invited to complete a survey prior to the workshop on current use of motion management techniques and their opinion on the effectiveness of each approach. A post-workshop survey was also conducted, designed to capture changes in opinion as a result of workshop participation. The online workshop was the most well attended ever hosted by the ACPSEM, with over 300 participants and a response to the pre-workshop survey was received from at least 60% of the radiation therapy centres in Australia and New Zealand. Motion management is extensively used in the region with use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reported by 98% of centres for left-sided breast treatments and 91% for at least some right-sided breast treatments. Surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) was the most popular session at the workshop and survey results showed that the use of SGRT is likely to increase. The workshop provided an excellent opportunity for the exchange of knowledge and experience, with most survey respondents indicating that their participation would lead to improvements in the quality of delivery of treatments at their centres.

Indexed as

RadiotherapyAustraliaHumansMovementNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesAustralasiaAustraliaMotion managementNew ZealandSurveyWorkshop

Identifiers

PMID38805104
PMCPMC11408578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.