ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
Identification of peroneal artery perforators using non-contrast-enhanced T2prep multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging MRA.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial resolution of non-contrast-enhanced (CE) T2prep multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging (MSG-EPI) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) required to identify peroneal artery perforators and demonstrate its effectiveness in preoperative simulation. Twenty-six legs of 13 volunteers were scanned using non-CE T2prep MSG-EPI-MRA at three spatial resolutions: 1.0-, 0.8-, and 0.6-mm isotropic voxels. The location and number of peroneal artery perforators that could be candidates for free fibula flaps were identified by consensus among three plastic surgeons. Surgeons distinguished between septocutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators using MRA, and confirmed the accuracy of their presence and identification using ultrasonography (US). The ability to detect hypoplasia or stenosis of the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries was evaluated by confirming the consistency between the MRA and US results. The number of cutaneous perforators identified using MRA and confirmed using US was 39, 51, and 52 at each respective resolution. The discrimination accuracies between septocutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators were 92.3%, 96.1%, and 96.2%. The number of identified septocutaneous perforators was 1.3 ± 0.6, 1.6 ± 0.8, and 1.7 ± 0.8 at 1.0-, 0.8-, and 0.6-mm data, respectively. All the MRA results, including hypoplasia and stenosis, were consistent with the US results. Non-CE T2prep MSG-EPI-MRA with a spatial resolution of 0.8 mm or less shows promise for identifying septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery, suggesting its potential as an alternative to conventional imaging methods for the preoperative planning of free fibula osteocutaneous flap transfers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38805078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.