ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Temporal dynamics of RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer: clinical significance of mutation loss during treatment.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic impact of circulating tumoriScience · 2026Article
- Effect of sex differences on the emergence of ctDNA RAS mutations in RAS wild-type colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Landscape of Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: From Genomics to Multi-Omics Integration in Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutation loss may occur during the standard-of-care regimen. In this study, we aimed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the RAS gene and its clinical significance.
methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study that included 82 patients with tissue RAS-mutant (RAS-MT) mCRC who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS monitoring between January, 2013-April, 2023. Patients were analyzed for the rate of change over time to acquired RAS mutation loss (aRAS-ML) and clinicopathological factors. The prognostic relevance of mutation loss was assessed.
resultsaRAS-ML was detected in 33 (40.2%) patients, 32 of whom had a mutation loss in the first ctDNA RAS assay. Patients with a RAS mutation detected in the first assay had a median time of 8 months until the second ctDNA RAS assay, with 4.5% cases newly converted to aRAS-ML; no new conversions were detected at the third assay. The aRAS-ML group exhibited more single-organ metastases in the target organ during ctDNA measurement (aRAS-ML: 84.8% vs. RAS-MT: 59.2%, p = 0.02). Of the 33 patients with aRAS-ML, seven (21.2%) received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy, with a median progression-free survival of 8 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that persistent ctDNA RAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-6.3, p = 0.02).
conclusionThe rate of ctDNA mutation loss in patients with RAS-MT mCRC decreases over time. Therefore, using a ctDNA RAS assay early in treatment will assist in challenging the use of EGFR regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.