Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38805038›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

Periprosthetic proximal humerus fractures require an individualized treatment approach-results of a multicenter retrospective study.

Sandra Boesmueller, Greta Lorenz, Rudolf Maximilian Kinsky, Daniel Schallmayer, Christian Fialka, Rainer Mittermayr

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra BoesmuellerAUVA Trauma Center Vienna Meidling, Kundratstrasse 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
Greta LorenzAUVA Trauma Center Vienna Meidling, Kundratstrasse 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria. gretalorenz@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-5340
Rudolf Maximilian KinskyAUVA Trauma Center Vienna Meidling, Kundratstrasse 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel SchallmayerAUVA Trauma Center Vienna Meidling, Kundratstrasse 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
Christian FialkaAUVA Trauma Center Vienna Meidling, Kundratstrasse 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
Rainer MittermayrAUVA Trauma Center Vienna Meidling, Kundratstrasse 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last years, there has been increasing use of shoulder arthroplasty. As a result, an increasing incidence of periprosthetic humerus fractures (PPHF) is expected. Therefore, this retrospective, multicenter analysis aimed to collect demographic data from patients with PPHF, their treatment strategies, and associated complications.

methodsDemographics of patients with PPHF were collected retrospectively from the database of six trauma hospitals between January 2000 and December 2020. All fractures were categorized according to the Wright and Cofield, and Worland classifications. In addition, the type of treatment for PPHF, as well as subsequent complications, were evaluated.

resultsA total of 72 patients with a PPHF were identified. The mean age of the 55 female and 17 male patients was 77 years. PPHF occurred a mean of 50 months after primary arthroplasty implantation, almost exclusively as a result of a fall from standing height (n = 67). In-situ implant was a RTSA in 40 patients and a hemiarthroplasty in 32 patients. More than half of the fractures (n = 38) were type B fractures, according to Wright and Cofield. According to Worland, the majority of patients also had a type B fracture (type B1 (n = 22), type B2 (n = 28), type B3 (n = 10)). Associated comorbidities were found in 21 patients. A total of 31 patients were treated non-operatively, 27 with Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF), and 14 with a revision arthroplasty. Nine primary radial nerve palsies were found (pre-operatively), and seven secondarily (post-operatively). Nine patients suffered from non-union (ORIF 4, non operative 4, stem replacement 1).

conclusionThe treatment strategy for PPHF is primarily tailored to the individual patient. Decisive factors such as patient's age, fracture type, and primary palsies have to be considered for optimal treatment. In type B1 fractures, there is a recommendation for ORIF because of high non-union rates under non-operative treatment. In contrast, in type B2 fractures, a non-operative approach should be preferred, provided there are no radial nerve lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, epidemiologic study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderPeriprosthetic FracturesShoulder FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesComplicationsEpidemiologyMulticenter studyPeriprosthetic humerus fracture (PPHF)Shoulder arthroplastyTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.