ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Learning Electronic Polarizations in Aqueous Systems.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Electronic Polarization in Molecular Systems: Vibrational Spectroscopy of Ethanol-Water Mixtures.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Entropy Governs the Structure and Reactivity of Water Dissociation Under Electric Fields.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Electric-field driven nuclear dynamics of liquids and solids from a multi-valued machine-learned dipolar model.npj computational materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The polarization of periodically repeating systems is a discontinuous function of the atomic positions, a fact which seems at first to stymie attempts at their statistical learning. Two approaches to build models for bulk polarizations are compared: one in which a simple point charge model is used to preprocess the raw polarization to give a learning target that is a smooth function of atomic positions and the total polarization is learned as a sum of atom-centered dipoles and one in which instead the average position of Wannier centers around atoms is predicted. For a range of bulk aqueous systems, both of these methods perform perform comparatively well, with the former being slightly better but often requiring an extra effort to find a suitable point charge model. As a challenging test, we also analyze the performance of the models at the air-water interface. In this case, while the Wannier center approach delivers accurate predictions without further modifications, the preprocessing method requires augmentation with information from isolated water molecules to reach similar accuracy. Finally, we present a simple protocol to preprocess the polarizations in a data-driven way using a small number of derivatives calculated at a much lower level of theory, thus overcoming the need to find point charge models without appreciably increasing the computation cost. We believe that the training strategies presented here help the construction of accurate polarization models required for the study of the dielectric properties of realistic complex bulk systems and interfaces with ab initio accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.