Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804913›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2024

Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for prevention of urinary retention in hip surgery patients: a multicentre observational study.

Madeleine Winberg, Maria Hälleberg Nyman, Erika Fjordkvist, Ann Catrine Eldh, Eva Joelsson-Alm

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madeleine WinbergFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6181-3932
Maria Hälleberg NymanFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden.
Erika FjordkvistFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden.
Ann Catrine EldhFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 83, Sweden.
Eva Joelsson-AlmDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-118 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9041-2468

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd ID STYA-2020/0002Region Örebro län
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary retention is a healthcare complication putting patients at risk of unnecessary suffering and harm. Orthopaedic patients are known to face an increased such risk, calling for evidence-based preoperative assessment and corresponding measures to prevent bladder problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate healthcare professionals' adherence to risk assessment guidelines for urinary retention in hip surgery patients. This was an observational study from January 2021 to April 2021 with a descriptive and comparative design, triangulating three data sources: (I) Medical records for 1382 hip surgery patients across 17 hospitals in Sweden were reviewed for preoperative risk assessments for urinary retention and voiding-related variables at discharge; (II) The patients completed a survey regarding postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms, and; (III) data were extracted from a national quality registry regarding type of surgery, preoperative physical status, and perioperative urinary complications. Group differences were analysed with Chi-square/Fisher's exact test, t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression was used to analyse variables associated with completed risk assessments for urinary retention. Of all study participants, 23.4% (n = 323) had a preoperative documented risk assessment of urinary retention. Whether a risk assessment was performed was significantly associated with acute surgery [odds ratio (OR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48-5.12] and undergoing surgery at an academic hospital (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.68-7.85). Acute patients were more often affected by urinary retention and had bladder issues and/or an indwelling catheter at discharge. More than every tenth patient (11. 9%, n = 53) completing the survey experienced intensified bladder problems after their hip surgery. The study shows a lack of adherence to risk assessment for urinary retention according to evidence-based guidelines, which negatively affects quality of care and patient safety.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePostoperative ComplicationsUrinary RetentionAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentSwedenevidence-based practicehip surgeryorthopaedic carepostoperative complicationsrisk assessmenturinary retention

Identifiers

PMID38804913
PMCPMC11155696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.