Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804732›Full record

ArticleCancer2024

Addressing financial toxicity in cancer treatment-An opportunity for the 340B drug pricing program.

Kassem S Faraj, Megan E V Caram, Vahakn B Shahinian, Brent K Hollenbeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kassem S FarajDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-0446
Megan E V CaramDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1597-5428
Vahakn B ShahinianDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Brent K HollenbeckDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Advanced Training in Urologic OncologyT32CA180984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ganesh S Palapattu, VAHAKN B SHAHINIAN · 2014 to 2026
$3.4M
Physician dispensing of oral specialty drugs for advanced prostate cancer and its implications for patientsR01CA275993 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLENBECK, BRENT K., SHAHINIAN, VAHAKN B · 2023 to 2025
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA180984NCI NIH HHS CA275993NCI NIH HHS R01 CA275993NCI NIH HHS T32 CA180984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatment has become increasingly expensive, partially due to the use of specialty drugs. The costs of these drugs are often passed down to patients, who may face the consequences of paying for more than they can afford, leading to financial toxicity. The 340B drug pricing program is a health care policy that may provide an opportunity to mitigate the financial consequences of cancer care. The 340B program requires manufacturers to sell outpatient drugs at a discount to hospitals caring for a significant number of socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals. The program intended for hospitals to use savings from discounted purchases to expand their safety net to vulnerable patients. Some studies have shown that participating hospitals do this by offering more charity and discounted care, whereas others have demonstrated that hospitals fail to sufficiently expand their safety net. A potential flaw of the program is the lack of guidance from governing bodies on how hospitals should use savings from discounted purchases. There has been growing discussion among stakeholders to reform the 340B program given the mixed findings of its effectiveness. With the rising costs of specialty drugs and associated prevalence of financial toxicity in patients with cancer, there is an opportunity to address these issues through reform that improves the program. Directing hospitals to offer specific safety net opportunities, such as passing along discounted drug prices to vulnerable populations, could help the growing number of patients who are financially burdened by medications at the core of the 340B program.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug CostsNeoplasmsHealth PolicyHumansUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents340B drug pricing programcancer treatmentfinancial toxicitysafety netspecialty drugs

Identifiers

PMID38804732
PMCPMC11347076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.