Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804653›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Assessing seromuscular layer and serosa removal on intestinal permeability measurements in weaned piglet everted sac segments.

Lonneke Noorman, Bart van der Hee, Myrthe S Gilbert, Sonja de Vries, Sylvia van der Hoek, Walter J J Gerrits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lonneke NoormanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7056-769X
Bart van der HeeHost-Microbe Interactomics, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Myrthe S GilbertAnimal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sonja de VriesAnimal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3842-8411
Sylvia van der HoekDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Walter J J GerritsAnimal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0494-9259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrity of the intestinal barrier is crucial for regulating the passage of pathogens and toxins, while facilitating nutrient absorption. The everted gut sac technique, an ex-vivo technique, can be used to study interventions on barrier function. This cost-effective approach utilizes relatively large gut segments to study specific intestinal regions. Typically, intact (non-stripped) intestinal segments are used, but their use may underestimate permeability due to the medial positioning of blood vessels relative to the seromuscular layer and serosa. However, removing these layers risks physical damage, resulting in an overestimation of intestinal permeability. Therefore, we investigated the impact of stripping jejunal segments on permeability to fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC, 4 kDa) and tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-dextran (TRITC, 40 kDa), and on the absorption of glucose, lysine, and methionine in jejunal segments from 80 piglets at 8 d postweaning. Piglets were subjected to either high or low sanitary housing conditions and diets provoking intestinal protein fermentation or not, expected to influence intestinal permeability. Stripping of the seromuscular layer and serosa increased the passage of 4 kDa FITC-dextran (stripped vs. non-stripped; 1.1 vs. 0.9 pmol/cm2/min, P < 0.001), glucose (40.0 vs. 19.1 pmol/cm2/min, P < 0.001), lysine (2.5 vs. 2.0 nmol/cm2/min, P < 0.001), and methionine (4.1 vs. 2.7 pmol/cm2/min, P < 0.001). As permeability increased, the differences in methionine passage between stripped and non-stripped intestinal segments also increased (slope = 1.30, P = 0.009). The coefficients of variation were comparable between stripped and non-stripped intestines (over all treatments, stripped vs. non-stripped 38% vs. 40%). Stripping, by isolating mucosal processes without introducing additional variation, is thus recommended for studies on intestinal permeability or absorption.

Indexed as

PermeabilityAnimalsDextransFemaleFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateIntestinal AbsorptionIntestinal Barrier FunctionIntestinal MucosaJejunumMaleSwineWeaningDextransFluorescein-5-isothiocyanatefluorescein isothiocyanate dextranabsorption capacityeverted gut sacintestinal barrier functionleaky gutstripping intestinal segmentsstripping the seromuscular layer and serosa

Identifiers

PMID38804653
PMCPMC11222984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.