Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804581›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2024

Statistical Testing for Protein Equivalence Identifies Core Functional Modules Conserved across 360 Cancer Cell Lines and Presents a General Approach to Investigating Biological Systems.

Enes K Ergin, Junia J K Myung, Philipp F Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protein Variability Patterns in Ovarian Serous Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enes K ErginDepartment of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z7, Canada.
Junia J K MyungDepartment of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z7, Canada.
Philipp F LangeDepartment of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-5864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative proteomics has enhanced our capability to study protein dynamics and their involvement in disease using various techniques, including statistical testing, to discern the significant differences between conditions. While most focus is on what is different between conditions, exploring similarities can provide valuable insights. However, exploring similarities directly from the analyte level, such as proteins, genes, or metabolites, is not a standard practice and is not widely adopted. In this study, we propose a statistical framework called QuEStVar (Quantitative Exploration of Stability and Variability through statistical hypothesis testing), enabling the exploration of quantitative stability and variability of features with a combined statistical framework. QuEStVar utilizes differential and equivalence testing to expand statistical classifications of analytes when comparing conditions. We applied our method to an extensive data set of cancer cell lines and revealed a quantitatively stable core proteome across diverse tissues and cancer subtypes. The functional analysis of this set of proteins highlighted the molecular mechanism of cancer cells to maintain constant conditions of the tumorigenic environment via biological processes, including transcription, translation, and nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProteomicsCell Line, TumorHumansProteomeProteomebioinformaticscancer cell linesequivalence testingproteomicsstatistics

Identifiers

PMID38804581
PMCPMC11166143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.