Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804339›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2024

MUltiparametric Score for Ventilation Discontinuation in Intensive Care Patients: A Protocol for an Observational Study.

Iacopo Cappellini, Andrea Cardoni, Lorenzo Campagnola, Guglielmo Consales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iacopo CappelliniDepartment of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9596-458X
Andrea CardoniDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-7185-6397
Lorenzo CampagnolaDepartment of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy.
Guglielmo ConsalesDepartment of Critical Care, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santo Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical ventilation significantly improves patient survival but is associated with complications, increasing healthcare costs and morbidity. Identifying optimal weaning times is paramount to minimize these risks, yet current methods rely heavily on clinical judgment, lacking specificity.

methodsThis study introduces a novel multiparametric predictive score, the MUSVIP (MUltiparametric Score for Ventilation discontinuation in Intensive care Patients), aimed at accurately predicting successful extubation. Conducted at Santo Stefano Hospital's ICU, this single-center, observational, prospective cohort study will span over 12 months, enrolling adult patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. The MUSVIP integrates variables measured before and during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) to formulate a predictive score.

resultsPreliminary analyses suggest an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.815 for the MUSVIP, indicating high predictive capacity. By systematically applying this score, we anticipate identifying patients likely to succeed in weaning earlier, potentially reducing ICU length of stay and associated healthcare costs.

conclusionThis study's findings could significantly influence clinical practices, offering a robust, easy-to-use tool for optimizing weaning processes in ICUs.

Indexed as

mechanical ventilationpredictive scoresuccessful extubationweaning

Identifiers

PMID38804339
PMCPMC11130949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.