Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804318›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Ladder Use Ability, Behavior and Exposure by Age and Gender.

Erika M Pliner, Daina L Sturnieks, Kurt E Beschorner, Mark S Redfern, Stephen R Lord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erika M PlinerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-5675
Daina L SturnieksFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4602-7685
Kurt E BeschornerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3058-2617
Mark S RedfernDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0097-4641
Stephen R LordFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

Funding

National Science Foundation GRFP 1247842Whitaker International Fellowship NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify and compare ladder use ability and behavior in younger and older men and women from three ladder use behavior experiments. The experimental tasks comprised (1) changing a lightbulb on a household stepladder under two cognitive demands (single and dual task), (2) clearing a simulated roof gutter on a straight ladder and (3) querying ladder choice in different exigency scenarios. Ladder use ability and behavior data were captured from recorded time, performance, motion capture and user choice data. In addition, this study surveyed ladder use frequency and habitual behaviors. The experimental findings indicate that older adults require more time to complete ladder tasks; younger adults display riskier ladder use behaviors; men and women display similar ladder use ability; and men are more willing to climb riskier ladders. The survey found older adults to report more frequent ladder use than younger adults, and men use straight ladders more frequently than women. These results suggest that the reported higher ladder fall rates experienced by older adults and men are linked to increased ladder use exposure and riskier ladder choice. This knowledge can help guide population-specific interventions to reduce ladder falls in both young and older people.

Indexed as

agedinjury preventionladder fallsrisk-takingtask performanceunsafe behavior

Identifiers

PMID38804318
PMCPMC11130934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.