Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804219›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Anna Batorsky, Kevin J Anstrom, Donglin Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna BatorskyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5644-0951
Kevin J AnstromDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program Data Integration, Algorithm Development and Operations Management CenterU24AR076730 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ANSTROM, KEVIN J, IVANOVA, ANASTASIA · 2019 to 2024
$60.0M
Statistical Methods for Integrating Mixed-type Biomarkers and Phenotypes in Neurodegenerative Disease ModelingR01NS073671 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2011 to 2025
$3.9M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Machine Learning Methods for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies for Precision PsychiatryR01MH123487 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS U24 AR076730NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104NIH HHS R01 GM124104NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123487NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are the gold standard for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs), but are costly and require a large sample size. We introduce the multi-stage augmented Q-learning estimator (MAQE) to improve efficiency of estimation of optimal DTRs by augmenting SMART data with observational data. Our motivating example comes from the Back Pain Consortium, where one of the overarching aims is to learn how to tailor treatments for chronic low back pain to individual patient phenotypes, knowledge which is lacking clinically. The Consortium-wide collaborative SMART and observational studies within the Consortium collect data on the same participant phenotypes, treatments, and outcomes at multiple time points, which can easily be integrated. Previously published single-stage augmentation methods for integration of trial and observational study (OS) data were adapted to estimate optimal DTRs from SMARTs using Q-learning. Simulation studies show the MAQE, which integrates phenotype, treatment, and outcome information from multiple studies over multiple time points, more accurately estimates the optimal DTR, and has a higher average value than a comparable Q-learning estimator without augmentation. We demonstrate this improvement is robust to a wide range of trial and OS sample sizes, addition of noise variables, and effect sizes.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationLow Back PainObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiometryHumansModels, StatisticalSample SizeTreatment OutcomeaugmentationBack Pain Consortiumdata integrationdoubly robustprecision medicineQ-learning

Identifiers

PMID38804219
PMCPMC11130757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.